Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Watts Matthew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Watts Matthew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Watts Matthew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Watts Matthew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:30 | 44:59 to 42:29 | 69.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:49 | 06:01 to 05:12 | 22.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 05:13 to 04:59 | 6.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:26 to 04:25 | 0.5% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:48 to 04:47 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:06 to 06:06 | 0.0% |
| Watts Matthew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:50 | 00:00 | 04:41 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 03:50 | 04:29 -00:03 | 04:41 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 05:26 | 08:16 | 05:03 +00:23 | 09:10 -00:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:21 | 13:42 | 02:59 -00:38 | 14:13 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 16:03 | 05:30 +00:15 | 17:12 -01:09 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 21:48 | 05:04 -00:34 | 22:42 -00:54 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 26:18 | 05:29 +00:10 | 27:46 -01:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:01 | 31:57 | 05:31 +00:30 | 33:15 -01:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:57 | 37:58 | 05:40 +00:17 | 38:46 -00:48 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 43:55 | 04:52 -00:04 | 44:26 -00:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 48:43 | 05:31 +00:09 | 49:18 -00:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 54:23 | 02:13 -00:08 | 54:49 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 56:28 | 05:30 +00:25 | 57:02 -00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:13 | 01:02:23 | 05:16 -00:03 | 01:02:32 -00:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:50 | 01:07:36 | 06:08 +00:42 | 01:07:48 -00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 06:06 | 01:14:26 | 06:44 -00:38 | 01:13:56 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 07:18 | 01:27:42 | 07:02 +00:16 | 01:27:42 |
Matthew Watts delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing with an overall rank of 1193, placing him in the top 38% of athletes. Within his age group, he ranked 262nd, positioning him in the top 41%. His total time was 01:27:42, reflecting a solid balance between endurance and strength. Notably, Matthew's pacing strategy started strong, as evidenced by his impressive first running segment, but he gradually slowed down in subsequent running segments. This suggests an initial burst of speed that he couldn't sustain throughout the race. His total running time was slightly slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in overall running endurance and speed. Matthew exhibits a hybrid profile, with potential in both running and strength, but there's room for improvement in both areas to become more competitive.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Seefeld Kai | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:27:47 | |
| Bales David | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:34 | |
| Vahlkamp Niels | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:27:39 | |
| Young Jamie | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:51 | |
| Fortes Rudy | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:28:11 | |
| Ashworth Jameson | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:27:25 | |
| Aguado Agenjo Jesús | 2023 Valencia | 01:28:08 | |
| Jalma Michael | 2023 Paris | 01:27:35 | |
| Kann Jonas Dirk | 2024 Berlin | 01:27:49 | |
| Cobb John | 2023 London | 01:27:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
