Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schultz Sam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schultz Sam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schultz Sam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schultz Sam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:28 | 04:07 to 02:39 | 29.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:13 | 07:08 to 05:55 | 24.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:43 | 05:36 to 04:53 | 14.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:36 | 05:09 to 04:33 | 12.0% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:01 to 04:42 | 6.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:17 to 02:01 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:35 to 04:21 | 4.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:10 | 04:54 to 04:44 | 3.3% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:24 to 38:24 | 0.0% |
| Schultz Sam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:34 | 00:00 | 04:33 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 03:34 | 04:25 +00:10 | 04:33 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 08:09 | 04:53 +00:03 | 08:58 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 04:07 | 13:05 | 02:52 +01:15 | 13:51 -00:46 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 17:12 | 05:20 -00:06 | 16:43 +00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 22:26 | 04:51 +00:18 | 22:03 +00:23 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 27:35 | 05:18 -00:23 | 26:54 +00:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:36 | 32:30 | 05:12 +00:24 | 32:12 +00:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:08 | 38:06 | 05:28 -00:20 | 37:24 +00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 43:14 | 04:47 +00:14 | 42:52 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 04:50 | 48:15 | 05:20 -00:30 | 47:39 +00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 53:05 | 02:08 +00:09 | 52:59 +00:06 |
| Running 7 | 04:47 | 55:22 | 05:19 -00:32 | 55:07 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:54 | 01:00:09 | 05:00 -00:06 | 01:00:26 -00:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:04 | 01:05:03 | 05:54 -00:50 | 01:05:26 -00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 07:08 | 01:10:07 | 06:20 +00:48 | 01:11:20 -01:13 |
| Roxzone | 07:13 | 01:24:20 | 06:40 +00:33 | 01:24:20 |
Sam Schultz demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier race, placing in the top 24% overall and in the top 27% of his age group. A standout aspect of his performance was his running, where he consistently finished faster than the average time. His total running time was 3:53 faster than average, indicating his strengths lie in this area. His fastest running lap was an impressive 4:47.
Through the first four running segments, Sam showed a tendency to start strong, as he was faster than average times, suggesting an effective pacing strategy. This indicates a solid running profile, with his running times consistently better than average. However, this also signifies a potential area for improvement in strength-based exercises.
Going forward, Sam should consider implementing a few key strategies to enhance his performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bean Richard | 2023 Manchester | 01:24:21 | |
| Mohacsi Tom | 2023 Chicago | 01:24:36 | |
| Pitman Benjamin | 2022 Dallas | 01:24:21 | |
| Scott Colin | 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:54 | |
| Kao Haoche | 2024 Taipei | 01:24:09 | |
| Tippett Simon | 2023 London | 01:24:06 | |
| Müller Martin | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:23:57 | |
| Newell Darren | 2024 London | 01:24:16 | |
| Steele Tom | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:24:02 | |
| Ang Alan | 2024 Singapore | 01:24:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
