Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Saathoff Erik's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Saathoff Erik's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Saathoff Erik's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Saathoff Erik's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:25. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:31 | 45:40 to 42:09 | 64.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:41 | 05:36 to 04:55 | 12.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:39 | 05:46 to 05:07 | 12.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:28 | 02:33 to 02:05 | 8.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 02:51 to 02:46 | 1.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:01 | 06:12 to 06:11 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Saathoff Erik | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:59 | 00:00 | 04:42 -00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 03:59 | 04:28 -00:21 | 04:42 -00:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 08:06 | 05:01 +00:30 | 09:10 -01:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 13:37 | 02:57 -00:06 | 14:11 -00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 16:28 | 05:27 +00:11 | 17:08 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 03:56 | 22:06 | 05:01 -01:05 | 22:35 -00:29 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 26:02 | 05:27 +00:02 | 27:36 -01:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:46 | 31:31 | 05:24 +00:22 | 33:03 -01:32 |
| Running 5 | 06:13 | 37:17 | 05:37 +00:36 | 38:27 -01:10 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 43:30 | 04:51 -00:21 | 44:04 -00:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:59 | 48:00 | 05:29 +00:30 | 48:55 -00:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 53:59 | 02:13 +00:20 | 54:24 -00:25 |
| Running 7 | 05:56 | 56:32 | 05:27 +00:29 | 56:37 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 01:02:28 | 05:11 +00:25 | 01:02:04 +00:24 |
| Running 8 | 06:58 | 01:08:04 | 06:07 +00:51 | 01:07:15 +00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 06:12 | 01:15:02 | 06:37 -00:25 | 01:13:22 +01:40 |
| Roxzone | 05:55 | 01:27:01 | 07:02 -01:07 | 01:27:01 |
Erik Saathoff delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing a spot in the top 36% overall and top 38% in his age group. His total running time was 2:01 slower than average, suggesting a need for improvement in running efficiency. Despite this, Erik showed strength in exercises such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, and Sled Pull, indicating a strong foundation in strength-based activities. His running splits reveal a fast start, with Running 1 being significantly faster than average, but he slowed down considerably in subsequent runs, which suggests the need for better pacing strategies.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grzelak Bartomiej | 2024 Katowice | 01:27:21 | |
| Smith Joshua | 2023 Dublin | 01:27:18 | |
| De La Lastra FerrerEgea Alejandro | 2024 Malaga | 01:26:43 | |
| Calvin Jay | 2024 Milan | 01:27:27 | |
| Masson Alexandre | 2024 Paris | 01:27:23 | |
| Sonnekalb Tobias | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:27:12 | |
| Hapke Karl | 2022 Berlin | 01:26:59 | |
| Goulding Sean | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:41 | |
| Meese Sam | 2022 Birmingham | 01:27:21 | |
| Norton James | 2022 London | 01:27:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:34:36 | |
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:47:52 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
