Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rennie Steven's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rennie Steven's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rennie Steven's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rennie Steven's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 00:41 | 02:41 to 02:00 | 27.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:40 | 05:30 to 04:50 | 26.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 03:03 to 02:38 | 16.8% |
| Run Total | 00:25 | 41:24 to 40:59 | 16.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:18 | 04:49 to 04:31 | 12.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:40 to 05:40 | 0.0% |
| Rennie Steven | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:25 | 00:00 | 04:33 +00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 05:25 | 04:25 -00:17 | 04:33 +00:52 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 09:33 | 04:53 -00:08 | 08:58 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 14:18 | 02:52 +00:11 | 13:51 +00:27 |
| Running 3 | 04:52 | 17:21 | 05:19 -00:27 | 16:43 +00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 22:13 | 04:50 -00:01 | 22:02 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 07:09 | 27:02 | 05:17 +01:52 | 26:52 +00:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 34:11 | 05:10 +00:20 | 32:09 +02:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:06 | 39:41 | 05:27 -00:21 | 37:19 +02:22 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 44:47 | 04:47 -00:05 | 42:46 +02:01 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 49:29 | 05:18 -00:23 | 47:33 +01:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:41 | 54:24 | 02:09 +00:32 | 52:51 +01:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:02 | 57:05 | 05:18 -00:16 | 55:00 +02:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:41 | 01:02:07 | 04:59 -00:18 | 01:00:18 +01:49 |
| Running 8 | 04:14 | 01:06:48 | 05:52 -01:38 | 01:05:17 +01:31 |
| Wall Balls | 05:40 | 01:11:02 | 06:17 -00:37 | 01:11:09 -00:07 |
| Roxzone | 07:28 | 01:24:02 | 06:36 +00:52 | 01:24:02 |
Steven Rennie's performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox race was commendable, especially considering his age category. He finished with an overall rank of 480th out of 1371 athletes, placing him in the top 35%. Within his age group (40-44), he ranked 56th out of 180 athletes, achieving a top 31% finish. His total running time was 56 seconds faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, there were discrepancies in his pacing, with the initial running segments being slower, suggesting a conservative start. Conversely, his final lap was significantly faster, perhaps indicating untapped potential or overly cautious initial pacing. Overall, Steven exhibits strong running capabilities but could benefit from additional strength training to balance his performance profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Andrew | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:24:08 | |
| Bakkoury Ayoub | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:52 | |
| Tessarin Andrea Riccardo | 2022 Valencia | 01:24:11 | |
| Clayton Maurice | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:39 | |
| Parker Joshua | 2022 Chicago | 01:23:49 | |
| Tebbutt Crispin | 2023 London | 01:24:24 | |
| Arrizabalaga Aitor | 2023 Madrid | 01:24:20 | |
| Aeschlimann Bruno | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:46 | |
| Watson Chance | 2023 Dallas | 01:23:52 | |
| Ballard Joshua | 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 01:23:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
