Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mccormick Declan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mccormick Declan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mccormick Declan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mccormick Declan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:11 | 06:23 to 05:12 | 27.3% |
| Sled Push | 01:01 | 03:49 to 02:48 | 23.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:46 | 07:03 to 06:17 | 17.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:38 | 05:37 to 04:59 | 14.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 05:09 to 04:47 | 8.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:43 to 04:25 | 6.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:10 to 02:06 | 1.5% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:11 to 40:11 | 0.0% |
| Mccormick Declan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:23 | 00:00 | 04:41 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 05:23 | 04:29 +00:14 | 04:41 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 04:48 | 10:06 | 05:03 -00:15 | 09:10 +00:56 |
| Sled Push | 03:49 | 14:54 | 02:59 +00:50 | 14:13 +00:41 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 18:43 | 05:30 -00:40 | 17:12 +01:31 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 23:33 | 05:03 +00:06 | 22:42 +00:51 |
| Running 4 | 04:48 | 28:42 | 05:29 -00:41 | 27:45 +00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:23 | 33:30 | 05:31 +00:52 | 33:14 +00:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:08 | 39:53 | 05:40 -00:32 | 38:45 +01:08 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 45:01 | 04:52 -00:08 | 44:25 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 49:45 | 05:31 -00:33 | 49:17 +00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 54:43 | 02:13 -00:03 | 54:48 -00:05 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 56:53 | 05:30 -00:32 | 57:01 -00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:37 | 01:01:51 | 05:15 +00:22 | 01:02:31 -00:40 |
| Running 8 | 05:21 | 01:07:28 | 06:09 -00:48 | 01:07:46 -00:18 |
| Wall Balls | 07:03 | 01:12:49 | 06:44 +00:19 | 01:13:55 -01:06 |
| Roxzone | 07:56 | 01:27:41 | 07:02 +00:54 | 01:27:41 |
Declan Mccormick delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Perth Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 267, which places him in the top 38% of the total participants. Notably, his total running time was 00:40:11, which is 03:43 faster than average, underscoring his strength as a runner. His best running lap was an impressive 00:04:48. While his overall time of 01:27:41 reflects a strong performance, there is room for improvement in strength-focused segments. His pacing strategy was well-executed, with faster times in later running segments, suggesting a strong finish. However, his initial pace was slightly slower than average, particularly in Running 1, indicating a conservative start. Overall, Declan's profile leans more towards a runner, with room to enhance strength-based activities.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ong Leonard | 2023 Singapore | 01:27:25 | |
| Stobbs Kristian | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:27:43 | |
| Monde Sjoerd | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:27:27 | |
| Brien Aaron | 2022 London | 01:27:21 | |
| Blum Marcel | 2023 Köln | 01:27:35 | |
| Reinhold Dominic | 2022 München | 01:28:11 | |
| Schäffler Michael | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:27:22 | |
| Purchase Dan | 2023 London | 01:27:57 | |
| Rietdijk Gino | 2024 Madrid | 01:27:55 | |
| Droppers Jordy | 2024 Maastricht | 01:27:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
