Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 193 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lynch Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lynch Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lynch Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lynch Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 00:47 | 31:23 to 30:36 | 30.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:26 | 04:43 to 04:17 | 16.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:24 | 02:40 to 02:16 | 15.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 04:08 to 03:48 | 12.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:00 to 03:47 | 8.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 01:41 to 01:29 | 7.7% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:13 to 04:02 | 7.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 03:19 to 03:17 | 1.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Lynch Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 02:47 | 00:00 | 03:26 -00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:00 | 02:47 | 03:52 +00:08 | 03:26 -00:39 |
| Running 2 | 03:49 | 06:47 | 03:38 +00:11 | 07:18 -00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 10:36 | 02:46 -00:06 | 10:56 -00:20 |
| Running 3 | 04:03 | 13:16 | 03:53 +00:10 | 13:42 -00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:08 | 17:19 | 04:03 +00:05 | 17:35 -00:16 |
| Running 4 | 04:04 | 21:27 | 03:53 +00:11 | 21:38 -00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:15 | 25:31 | 02:50 -00:35 | 25:31 +00:00 |
| Running 5 | 04:11 | 27:46 | 03:57 +00:14 | 28:21 -00:35 |
| Rowing | 04:13 | 31:57 | 04:04 +00:09 | 32:18 -00:21 |
| Running 6 | 03:59 | 36:10 | 03:54 +00:05 | 36:22 -00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 40:09 | 01:39 +00:02 | 40:16 -00:07 |
| Running 7 | 04:08 | 41:50 | 03:56 +00:12 | 41:55 -00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:19 | 45:58 | 03:22 -00:03 | 45:51 +00:07 |
| Running 8 | 04:25 | 49:17 | 04:14 +00:11 | 49:13 +00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 04:43 | 53:42 | 04:41 +00:02 | 53:27 +00:15 |
| Roxzone | 03:46 | 01:02:03 | 03:55 -00:09 | 01:02:03 |
Mark's best running lap was 00:02:47, which was 42 seconds faster than the average. This indicates that he excelled in this particular segment and showed great speed and endurance.
In summary, Mark Lynch had an outstanding performance in the 2023 Birmingham Hyrox race, ranking in the top 1% overall and top 2% in his age group. To further improve his performance, he should focus on the Sled Pull and Wall Balls segments, incorporating specific exercises and techniques to enhance his upper body and grip strength. Additionally, he should pay attention to his pacing and transition times, and tailor his training routine to address any areas of weakness.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Franssens Tom | 2023 Madrid | 01:01:40 | |
| Sloan Andy | 2024 Birmingham | 01:01:36 | |
| Hoffmann Janik | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:01:34 | |
| Cummins Scott | 2024 Melbourne | 01:01:45 | |
| Dean Marc | 2024 Manchester | 01:01:48 | |
| Kreutzer Julian | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:01:53 | |
| Martin Michelius | 2022 Valencia | 01:01:57 | |
| Wills Beau | 2023 Rimini | 01:02:11 | |
| Bianchi Eugenio | 2023 Milan | 01:02:30 | |
| Bianchi Eugenio | 2022 Hamburg | 01:02:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:04:16 | |
| 2022 London | 01:03:26 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:03:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
