Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Jennings Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Jennings Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Jennings Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Jennings Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:54 | 06:21 to 04:27 | 32.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:05 | 05:29 to 04:24 | 18.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:52 | 03:19 to 02:27 | 14.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:52 | 05:05 to 04:13 | 14.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:24 | 05:51 to 05:27 | 6.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 04:36 to 04:16 | 5.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:06 to 01:53 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:46 to 04:35 | 3.1% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:23 to 37:23 | 0.0% |
| Jennings Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:02 | 00:00 | 04:23 +00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 05:02 | 04:21 +00:15 | 04:23 +00:39 |
| Running 2 | 04:18 | 09:38 | 04:43 -00:25 | 08:44 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 13:56 | 02:44 +00:35 | 13:27 +00:29 |
| Running 3 | 04:28 | 17:15 | 05:07 -00:39 | 16:11 +01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:05 | 21:43 | 04:33 +00:32 | 21:18 +00:25 |
| Running 4 | 04:38 | 26:48 | 05:05 -00:27 | 25:51 +00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:21 | 31:26 | 04:52 +01:29 | 30:56 +00:30 |
| Running 5 | 04:40 | 37:47 | 05:14 -00:34 | 35:48 +01:59 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 42:27 | 04:40 +00:06 | 41:02 +01:25 |
| Running 6 | 04:39 | 47:13 | 05:07 -00:28 | 45:42 +01:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 51:52 | 02:03 +00:03 | 50:49 +01:03 |
| Running 7 | 04:40 | 53:58 | 05:05 -00:25 | 52:52 +01:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:29 | 58:38 | 04:42 +00:47 | 57:57 +00:41 |
| Running 8 | 05:01 | 01:04:07 | 05:34 -00:33 | 01:02:39 +01:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:51 | 01:09:08 | 05:56 -00:05 | 01:08:13 +00:55 |
| Roxzone | 05:26 | 01:20:17 | 06:08 -00:42 | 01:20:17 |
Ian Jennings delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX, finishing in the top 23% of all athletes and the top 27% in his age group. His overall time of 01:20:17 indicates a solid fitness level and a good balance of strength and endurance. His total running time of 00:37:23 was impressive, being 03:09 faster than the average, which suggests a runner profile. On evaluating his pacing, it appears that Ian started slower than average in the first running segment, but he consistently improved and ran faster in the subsequent segments.
Based on his performance, Ian should consider the following strategies for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wiebe Simon | 2023 Anaheim | 01:20:14 | |
| Dahlkamp Michael | 2019 New York | 01:19:47 | |
| Voicescu Sorin | 2023 Valencia | 01:20:22 | |
| Bowden Sam | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:41 | |
| Hammer Ben | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:15 | |
| Holroyd Robin | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:20:13 | |
| Missotten Laurent | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:20:47 | |
| Hanna John | 2023 London | 01:19:50 | |
| LynamCarter Ross | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:39 | |
| Emmel Joey | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:20:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Bordeaux | 01:22:38 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:28:33 | |
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:19:32 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:19:32 | |
| 2024 Marseille | 01:14:28 | |
| 2023 London | 01:21:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
