Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 753 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Gallagher Emma's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Gallagher Emma hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Gallagher Emma’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gallagher Emma's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:08 | 09:25 to 07:17 | 42.0% |
| Run Total | 01:24 | 52:09 to 50:45 | 27.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:53 | 06:25 to 05:32 | 17.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 03:45 to 03:05 | 13.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:16 to 06:16 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Gallagher Emma | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:36 | 00:00 | 05:35 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 04:36 | 05:20 -00:21 | 05:35 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 06:15 | 09:35 | 06:08 +00:07 | 10:55 -01:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:45 | 15:50 | 03:08 +00:37 | 17:03 -01:13 |
| Running 3 | 06:33 | 19:35 | 06:29 +00:04 | 20:11 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 06:16 | 26:08 | 06:43 -00:27 | 26:40 -00:32 |
| Running 4 | 06:39 | 32:24 | 06:32 +00:07 | 33:23 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:25 | 39:03 | 07:30 +01:55 | 39:55 -00:52 |
| Running 5 | 06:49 | 48:28 | 06:43 +00:06 | 47:25 +01:03 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 55:17 | 05:40 -00:14 | 54:08 +01:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:50 | 01:00:43 | 06:34 +00:16 | 59:48 +00:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 01:07:33 | 02:31 -00:16 | 01:06:22 +01:11 |
| Running 7 | 06:49 | 01:09:48 | 06:34 +00:15 | 01:08:53 +00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:25 | 01:16:37 | 05:40 +00:45 | 01:15:27 +01:10 |
| Running 8 | 07:41 | 01:23:02 | 07:14 +00:27 | 01:21:07 +01:55 |
| Wall Balls | 05:27 | 01:30:43 | 06:04 -00:37 | 01:28:21 +02:22 |
| Roxzone | 06:40 | 01:42:44 | 08:19 -01:39 | 01:42:44 |
In terms of specific splits, Emma performed exceptionally well in the Running 1 and Ski Erg segments, finishing 00:47 and 00:20 faster than average, respectively. However, she struggled in segments such as the Burpees Broad Jump, Sandbag Lunges, Running 6, Running 7, Sled Push, Running 8, and Running 2, where she lost significant time compared to the average.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on targeted training, Emma can improve her performance in future Hyrox races and continue to excel in her age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bosio Martina | 2024 Rimini | 01:42:54 | |
| Hickey Eileen | 2021 Dallas | 01:43:02 | |
| Manning Millie | 2024 Stockholm | 01:43:06 | |
| Armour Michele | 2024 Glasgow | 01:42:29 | |
| Din Ana | 2024 Paris | 01:42:37 | |
| Anduiza Pilar | 2022 Valencia | 01:43:02 | |
| Forenza Dani | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:42:49 | |
| Albrecht Monia | 2021 Hamburg | 01:42:32 | |
| Ross Hannah | 2024 Birmingham | 01:42:36 | |
| LópezAstilleros Fernández Lidia | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:38:15 | |
| 2023 London | 01:34:37 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:33:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
