Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
976 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 976 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 976 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 976 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
07:21.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 976 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Daniel Culloty, competing in the HYROX event in the 35-39 age group, demonstrated a commendable performance finishing in the top 59% of all athletes and in the top 67% of his age group. His overall time was 01:46:33, and his total running time was 00:55:54, which was 04:06 slower than average. This suggests a stronger performance in strength-related exercises than running. Remarkably, his performance in the initial running segment and the Burpees Broad Jump, and Wall Balls segments were significantly faster than average, indicating a high level of strength and explosive power. However, he started the race at a fast pace and gradually slowed down in the following segments, particularly in running.
Segments to Improve
Running: Daniel's average running time was slower than average, indicating a need for improvement. To enhance his running performance, Daniel should focus on endurance training. Activities like long, slow runs, interval training, and hill sprints can help improve stamina and pace. Also, incorporating strength training to build lower body muscle and improve running economy could be beneficial.
Sled Pull: Daniel's sled pull time was slower than average, suggesting a need for improved strength and technique. Specific training like rope pulls and tire drags can help build the necessary strength. In addition, drills focusing on proper form – straight back, low body position, and strong leg drive – can improve efficiency and speed in this segment.
Rowing: Daniel's rowing performance was also slower than average. Increasing the frequency of rowing workouts and focusing on proper form, with strong, controlled strokes, can help improve performance in this area. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) on the rowing machine can also enhance cardiovascular fitness and stamina.
Farmers Carry: The Farmer's Carry was another area where Daniel was slower than average. This exercise primarily involves grip strength and core stability. Incorporating specific exercises like deadlifts, suitcase carries and wrist curls can help enhance grip strength. Additionally, core strengthening exercises like planks and Russian twists can improve stability.
Race Strategies
Given Daniel's performance, a few race strategies can be suggested for better performance:
Pacing: Given the fast start and gradual slowdown, Daniel should focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race. This can be achieved by practicing pace runs and using tools like a GPS watch to monitor pace in real-time.
Strength-Endurance Balance: As Daniel's performance is better in strength-related exercises, he should strategically save his energy for these segments. However, this should not be at the cost of running performance. A balance must be struck between the two.
Transition Time: Daniel's roxzone time was faster than average, indicating efficient transitions. However, there is still room for improvement. Practicing smooth transitions between different exercises can help reduce this time further.