Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Craine Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Craine Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Craine Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Craine Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:38 | 06:05 to 04:27 | 31.9% |
| Run Total | 01:36 | 36:07 to 34:31 | 31.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 04:21 to 03:28 | 17.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:38 | 02:37 to 01:59 | 12.4% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 04:32 to 04:20 | 3.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:12 to 04:02 | 3.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:13 to 03:13 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:28 to 01:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:21 to 03:21 | 0.0% |
| Craine Thomas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:21 | 00:00 | 03:56 -00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:21 | 04:11 +00:01 | 03:56 -00:35 |
| Running 2 | 04:29 | 07:33 | 04:14 +00:15 | 08:07 -00:34 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 12:02 | 02:25 +00:12 | 12:21 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 04:45 | 14:39 | 04:31 +00:14 | 14:46 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 04:21 | 19:24 | 03:57 +00:24 | 19:17 +00:07 |
| Running 4 | 04:38 | 23:45 | 04:31 +00:07 | 23:14 +00:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:13 | 28:23 | 03:58 -00:45 | 27:45 +00:38 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 31:36 | 04:38 +00:07 | 31:43 -00:07 |
| Rowing | 04:32 | 36:21 | 04:27 +00:05 | 36:21 +00:00 |
| Running 6 | 04:34 | 40:53 | 04:32 +00:02 | 40:48 +00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:28 | 45:27 | 01:48 -00:20 | 45:20 +00:07 |
| Running 7 | 04:32 | 46:55 | 04:32 +00:00 | 47:08 -00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:21 | 51:27 | 04:00 -00:39 | 51:40 -00:13 |
| Running 8 | 05:06 | 54:48 | 04:50 +00:16 | 55:40 -00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 06:05 | 59:54 | 04:59 +01:06 | 01:00:30 -00:36 |
| Roxzone | 04:37 | 01:10:27 | 04:58 -00:21 | 01:10:27 |
One area of improvement for Thomas is his total running time, which was 36 minutes and 7 seconds, 1 minute and 20 seconds slower than the average. This suggests that Thomas may benefit from focusing on improving his overall fitness and transition time between exercise zones. By enhancing his endurance and speed, he can reduce the time spent in the roxzone and improve his overall race performance.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Thomas can further enhance his performance in future Hyrox races. It is important to tailor the training strategies and techniques to his specific needs, considering his age group, nationality, overall rank, and detailed splits compared to the average for his finish time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Golbach Erik | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:10:51 | |
| Nannetti Valentino | 2024 Rimini | 01:10:27 | |
| Berry Andrew | 2023 Melbourne | 01:10:23 | |
| Agertoft Nielsen Jan | 2024 Stockholm | 01:10:50 | |
| Blyth Louis | 2024 Berlin | 01:10:48 | |
| Obi Junior | 2022 Birmingham | 01:10:35 | |
| Strauch Martin | 2022 Basel | 01:10:26 | |
| Bookout Alex | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:10:32 | |
| Jackson Dan | 2023 London | 01:10:07 | |
| Ansari Tahir Ahmed | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:10:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Gdansk | 01:16:09 | |
| 2024 London | 01:16:14 | |
| 2023 London | 01:19:19 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
