Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cox Ella's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cox Ella's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cox Ella's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cox Ella's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:55 | 44:20 to 42:25 | 47.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:31 | 05:27 to 03:56 | 37.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:26 | 05:33 to 05:07 | 10.7% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:16 to 05:07 | 3.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:03 | 04:55 to 04:52 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Cox Ella | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:17 | 00:00 | 04:55 +00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 05:17 | 05:00 -00:30 | 04:55 +00:22 |
| Running 2 | 07:00 | 09:47 | 05:15 +01:45 | 09:55 -00:08 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 16:47 | 02:35 -00:20 | 15:10 +01:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 19:02 | 05:30 -00:06 | 17:45 +01:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:55 | 24:26 | 05:21 -00:26 | 23:15 +01:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 29:21 | 05:32 -00:02 | 28:36 +00:45 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:33 | 34:51 | 05:34 -00:01 | 34:08 +00:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:25 | 40:24 | 05:40 -00:15 | 39:42 +00:42 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 45:49 | 05:14 +00:02 | 45:22 +00:27 |
| Running 6 | 05:05 | 51:05 | 05:34 -00:29 | 50:36 +00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 56:10 | 02:09 -00:12 | 56:10 +00:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 58:07 | 05:31 -00:21 | 58:19 -00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:43 | 01:03:17 | 04:25 -00:42 | 01:03:50 -00:33 |
| Running 8 | 05:34 | 01:07:00 | 05:53 -00:19 | 01:08:15 -01:15 |
| Wall Balls | 05:27 | 01:12:34 | 04:28 +00:59 | 01:14:08 -01:34 |
| Roxzone | 07:00 | 01:24:52 | 06:16 +00:44 | 01:24:52 |
Ella Cox put up a commendable performance at the 2024 Poznan event, finishing in the top 7% of total participants and securing the 13th rank in her age group. She exhibited an excellent performance in strength-related tasks, consistently achieving times faster than the average. However, Ella's overall running time was slower than average, indicating that she has a stronger strength profile. Also, her pacing appeared to be inconsistent, with some running segments significantly slower than the average while others were faster. This suggests a need for focused training to improve running stamina and pacing strategy.
Ella should consider implementing the following strategies during her race for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Blomberg Johanna | 2024 Stockholm | 01:24:59 | |
| Vincent Emily | 2024 Dallas | 01:24:33 | |
| Unternahrer Aurélie | 2024 Marseille | 01:24:26 | |
| DeekenUhle Anne | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:00 | |
| Dunstan Jennifer | 2023 London | 01:25:00 | |
| Jarosch AnnMareike | 2024 Köln | 01:25:10 | |
| Barnes Ashley | 2024 Stockholm | 01:24:24 | |
| Burger Iris | 2023 Wien | 01:24:47 | |
| Clarke Heidi | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:04 | |
| Rhodes Jasmine | 2024 Houston | 01:24:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:31:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
