Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bevan David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bevan David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bevan David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bevan David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:02 | 05:22 to 04:20 | 32.6% |
| Run Total | 01:00 | 39:42 to 38:42 | 31.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 04:49 to 04:18 | 16.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 04:36 to 04:08 | 14.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:33 to 02:24 | 4.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:07 to 04:07 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Bevan David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:11 | 00:00 | 04:21 -01:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:07 | 03:11 | 04:20 -00:13 | 04:21 -01:10 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 07:18 | 04:40 -00:10 | 08:41 -01:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 11:48 | 02:41 -00:08 | 13:21 -01:33 |
| Running 3 | 06:06 | 14:21 | 05:04 +01:02 | 16:02 -01:41 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 20:27 | 04:29 +00:07 | 21:06 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 25:03 | 05:03 -00:02 | 25:35 -00:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:22 | 30:04 | 04:46 +00:36 | 30:38 -00:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 35:26 | 05:11 +00:20 | 35:24 +00:02 |
| Rowing | 04:28 | 40:57 | 04:40 -00:12 | 40:35 +00:22 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 45:25 | 05:04 -00:09 | 45:15 +00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 50:20 | 02:02 -00:13 | 50:19 +00:01 |
| Running 7 | 04:55 | 52:09 | 05:03 -00:08 | 52:21 -00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:49 | 57:04 | 04:38 +00:11 | 57:24 -00:20 |
| Running 8 | 05:37 | 01:01:53 | 05:31 +00:06 | 01:02:02 -00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 04:58 | 01:07:30 | 05:50 -00:52 | 01:07:33 -00:03 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:19:24 | 06:01 +01:04 | 01:19:24 |
Pacing Analysis:
David's overall pacing was relatively consistent throughout the race, with some segments performed faster or slower than average. It is important to note that his total running time was 01:04 slower than average, indicating that he may benefit from improving his running abilities. Additionally, his Roxzone time was 01:08 slower than average, suggesting that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition times.
Overall, David Bevan had a strong performance in the 2023 Birmingham Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running endurance and speed, as well as working on his transition times, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and mental preparation, will help him reach his full potential as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Herrmann Martin | 2024 Köln | 01:19:38 | |
| Tao Ben | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:19:33 | |
| Burrows Paul | 2023 London | 01:19:49 | |
| De Die Christian | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:19:07 | |
| Majenka Robert | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:19:49 | |
| Doherty Philip | 2023 Birmingham | 01:19:06 | |
| Lay Florian | 2021 Berlin | 01:19:49 | |
| Enjaux Sebastien | 2024 Paris | 01:19:33 | |
| Hooiveld Niels | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:19:32 | |
| Guillaume Clement | 2024 Perth | 01:19:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
