Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Abols Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Abols Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Abols Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Abols Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:10 | 40:52 to 38:42 | 51.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:49 | 04:57 to 04:08 | 19.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:26 | 04:44 to 04:18 | 10.4% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 04:53 to 04:34 | 7.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 02:08 to 01:51 | 6.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:10 | 02:34 to 02:24 | 4.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Abols Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:48 | 00:00 | 04:21 -00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:48 | 04:20 -00:08 | 04:21 -00:33 |
| Running 2 | 04:22 | 08:00 | 04:41 -00:19 | 08:41 -00:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:34 | 12:22 | 02:42 -00:08 | 13:22 -01:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 14:56 | 05:05 +00:33 | 16:04 -01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 04:57 | 20:34 | 04:30 +00:27 | 21:09 -00:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 25:31 | 05:04 +00:09 | 25:39 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:01 | 30:44 | 04:47 -00:46 | 30:43 +00:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:27 | 34:45 | 05:12 +00:15 | 35:30 -00:45 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 40:12 | 04:40 +00:13 | 40:42 -00:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:09 | 45:05 | 05:05 +00:04 | 45:22 -00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 50:14 | 02:01 +00:07 | 50:27 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:00 | 52:22 | 05:03 -00:03 | 52:28 -00:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 57:22 | 04:38 +00:06 | 57:31 -00:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:18 | 01:02:06 | 05:33 +00:45 | 01:02:09 -00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 04:51 | 01:08:24 | 05:52 -01:01 | 01:07:42 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 06:31 | 01:19:38 | 06:04 +00:27 | 01:19:38 |
In terms of pacing, Kevin showed a consistent effort throughout the race, with most of his splits being faster than average. This indicates that he maintained a steady level of intensity and did not have any significant drop-offs in performance. However, it's worth noting that his total running time was 02:12 slower than the average, suggesting that he may benefit from improving his running capabilities.
In conclusion, Kevin Abols had a strong performance in the 2022 Manchester Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques tailored to address his weaknesses in running endurance, transition time, rowing, and running speed, Kevin can improve his performance in future races. Implementing race strategies such as pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation will also contribute to his overall success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Ross | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:58 | |
| Aram Bardia | 2023 London | 01:20:05 | |
| Swan Alex | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:19:19 | |
| Lumbreras Orlando | 2024 Bilbao | 01:19:32 | |
| Eleiwi Maad | 2024 Maastricht | 01:19:12 | |
| Cooper Tom | 2023 Sydney | 01:19:52 | |
| Nottage Seb | 2023 London | 01:19:29 | |
| Burrows Paul | 2023 London | 01:19:49 | |
| Torpey Andrew | 2024 Paris | 01:19:58 | |
| Haasnoot Thijs | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:19:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:18:10 | |
| 2022 London | 01:22:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
