Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mclaughlin Ryan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mclaughlin Ryan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mclaughlin Ryan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mclaughlin Ryan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:27 | 06:11 to 04:44 | 25.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:12 | 07:07 to 05:55 | 21.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:04 | 05:37 to 04:33 | 18.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:48 | 05:41 to 04:53 | 14.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:29 | 03:08 to 02:39 | 8.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:21 to 02:01 | 5.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:34 to 04:21 | 3.8% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:48 to 04:42 | 1.8% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:46 to 37:46 | 0.0% |
| Mclaughlin Ryan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:53 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 04:53 | 04:25 +00:09 | 04:34 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 09:27 | 04:54 -00:27 | 08:59 +00:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:08 | 13:54 | 02:52 +00:16 | 13:53 +00:01 |
| Running 3 | 04:36 | 17:02 | 05:21 -00:45 | 16:45 +00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:37 | 21:38 | 04:51 +00:46 | 22:06 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 04:44 | 27:15 | 05:19 -00:35 | 26:57 +00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:41 | 31:59 | 05:12 +00:29 | 32:16 -00:17 |
| Running 5 | 04:51 | 37:40 | 05:29 -00:38 | 37:28 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 42:31 | 04:47 +00:01 | 42:57 -00:26 |
| Running 6 | 04:47 | 47:19 | 05:20 -00:33 | 47:44 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 52:06 | 02:08 +00:13 | 53:04 -00:58 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 54:27 | 05:19 -00:35 | 55:12 -00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:11 | 59:11 | 04:59 +01:12 | 01:00:31 -01:20 |
| Running 8 | 04:49 | 01:05:22 | 05:55 -01:06 | 01:05:30 -00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 07:07 | 01:10:11 | 06:20 +00:47 | 01:11:25 -01:14 |
| Roxzone | 07:16 | 01:24:25 | 06:40 +00:36 | 01:24:25 |
Ryan Mclaughlin delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 229, placing him in the top 33% of athletes. Notably, Ryan's total running time of 00:37:46 was 04:44 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. His running segments consistently outperformed the average, suggesting excellent endurance and pacing capabilities. However, the slower transitions in the Roxzone and certain strength-based exercises suggest room for improvement in strength and transition efficiency.
Ryan's initial running segment was slightly slower than average, but he significantly improved in subsequent segments, indicating a conservative start that allowed for stronger performance later in the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Battafarano Alessandro | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:18 | |
| Evans Dylan | 2024 London | 01:24:02 | |
| Franko Matej | 2023 Milan | 01:24:43 | |
| Fonda Chris | 2023 Melbourne | 01:24:40 | |
| Harrell Andre | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:24:33 | |
| Weirauch Heiko | 2018 Leipzig | 01:24:15 | |
| Smith Aaron | 2023 Glasgow | 01:24:23 | |
| Hoang David | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:47 | |
| Lytle John | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:24:31 | |
| Mccosh David | 2023 London | 01:24:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
