Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mackie James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mackie James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mackie James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mackie James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:24 | 06:17 to 04:53 | 32.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:07 | 05:51 to 04:44 | 26.3% |
| Wall Balls | 01:01 | 06:56 to 05:55 | 23.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 03:02 to 02:39 | 9.0% |
| Run Total | 00:12 | 41:21 to 41:09 | 4.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:09 to 02:01 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Mackie James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:32 | 00:00 | 04:34 -01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 03:32 | 04:25 -00:04 | 04:34 -01:02 |
| Running 2 | 07:11 | 07:53 | 04:54 +02:17 | 08:59 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 15:04 | 02:51 +00:11 | 13:53 +01:11 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 18:06 | 05:21 -00:35 | 16:44 +01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:24 | 22:52 | 04:51 -00:27 | 22:05 +00:47 |
| Running 4 | 04:56 | 27:16 | 05:19 -00:23 | 26:56 +00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:17 | 32:12 | 05:12 +01:05 | 32:15 -00:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:08 | 38:29 | 05:29 -00:21 | 37:27 +01:02 |
| Rowing | 04:27 | 43:37 | 04:47 -00:20 | 42:56 +00:41 |
| Running 6 | 05:10 | 48:04 | 05:20 -00:10 | 47:43 +00:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 53:14 | 02:08 +00:01 | 53:03 +00:11 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 55:23 | 05:20 -00:15 | 55:11 +00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 01:00:28 | 04:59 +00:52 | 01:00:31 -00:03 |
| Running 8 | 05:35 | 01:06:19 | 05:54 -00:19 | 01:05:30 +00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 06:56 | 01:11:54 | 06:19 +00:37 | 01:11:24 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:40 | 01:24:23 | 06:40 -01:00 | 01:24:23 |
James Mackie demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX event, finishing in the top 60% of all athletes and the top 56% of his age group (40-44). His overall time was 01:24:23, showcasing his endurance and determination. James performed particularly well in running, with a total running time of 00:41:21, which was 00:59 faster than the average time. This suggests that running is one of his strengths, placing him in a runner profile category.
James paced himself well throughout the race, with an impressive start as seen in Running 1 where he was 01:01 faster than the average. He maintained a consistent pace in most running segments, which is crucial for such endurance events. His performance in the Roxzone segment was faster than average, indicating good transition times and overall fitness.
During the race, James should consider the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sagdahl Kim Andre | 2024 Beijing | 01:24:11 | |
| Jansen Maurice | 2022 Dallas | 01:24:42 | |
| Royce Dan | 2024 London | 01:24:37 | |
| Schlicke Danny | 2019 Leipzig | 01:24:36 | |
| Kernahan Gary | 2024 Glasgow | 01:24:19 | |
| Richter David | 2023 Hamburg | 01:24:04 | |
| Sumner Philip | 2024 Paris | 01:24:48 | |
| Mcbride Eamonn | 2024 London | 01:24:06 | |
| Clark George | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:24:01 | |
| Pérez Ríos Andrés Felipe | 2021 Madrid | 01:24:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:37 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
