Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Der Veen Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Der Veen Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Der Veen Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Der Veen Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:42 | 42:31 to 40:49 | 54.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:36 | 05:05 to 04:29 | 19.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:21 | 05:09 to 04:48 | 11.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:12 to 01:59 | 6.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:09 | 02:46 to 02:37 | 4.8% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:45 to 04:41 | 2.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:03 | 05:53 to 05:50 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Van Der Veen Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:33 | 00:00 | 04:32 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 04:33 | 04:24 -00:11 | 04:32 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 08:46 | 04:52 -00:02 | 08:56 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 13:36 | 02:51 -00:05 | 13:48 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 16:22 | 05:17 +00:05 | 16:39 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:05 | 21:44 | 04:47 +00:18 | 21:56 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 26:49 | 05:15 +00:32 | 26:43 +00:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:09 | 32:36 | 05:06 +00:03 | 31:58 +00:38 |
| Running 5 | 05:19 | 37:45 | 05:25 -00:06 | 37:04 +00:41 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 43:04 | 04:46 -00:01 | 42:29 +00:35 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 47:49 | 05:17 +00:05 | 47:15 +00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 53:11 | 02:08 +00:04 | 52:32 +00:39 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 55:23 | 05:16 -00:07 | 54:40 +00:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:20 | 01:00:32 | 04:57 -00:37 | 59:56 +00:36 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:04:52 | 05:49 +00:23 | 01:04:53 -00:01 |
| Wall Balls | 05:53 | 01:11:04 | 06:17 -00:24 | 01:10:42 +00:22 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:23:32 | 06:33 +00:11 | 01:23:32 |
Splits Analysis:
Analyzing the splits, Patrick's performance varied across different segments of the race. His best running lap was 00:04:33, indicating a strong running ability. However, he struggled in Running 4, with a time of 00:05:47, which was 00:32 slower than the average. Other segments where he lost time compared to the average include Burpees Broad Jump, Running 8, and Roxzone.
In conclusion, Patrick van der Veen had a strong performance in the 2021 Amsterdam Hyrox race, placing in the top percentage of athletes in his age group. To further improve his performance, he should focus on specific segments where he lost time compared to the average, such as Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Roxzone, and Running 8. By incorporating targeted training strategies and techniques, including interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, Patrick can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shaikh Suleman | 2023 Hamburg | 01:23:37 | |
| Darling Andy | 2023 Glasgow | 01:23:04 | |
| Favre Yann | 2023 München | 01:23:24 | |
| Johnston Bryan | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:23:33 | |
| Austin Chris | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:03 | |
| Hilton Daniel | 2024 London | 01:23:38 | |
| Moore Darren | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:36 | |
| Pojonisevs Ruslans | 2024 Katowice | 01:23:18 | |
| Issa Julian | 2023 Valencia | 01:23:57 | |
| Van Gessel Martijn | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:23:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Essen | 01:26:27 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:29:49 | |
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:25:01 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:27:01 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
