Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:16 (From 46:44 to 41:28) | 73.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:54 (From 06:42 to 04:48) | 26.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:01 to 04:01) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:36 to 02:36) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 03:26 to 03:26) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 03:59 to 03:59) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:34 to 04:34) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:25 to 01:25) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:30 to 05:30) | 0.0% |
| Van Den Berg Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:56 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 04:56 | 04:26 -00:25 | 04:36 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 08:57 | 04:56 +00:37 | 09:02 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:36 | 14:30 | 02:52 -00:16 | 13:58 +00:32 |
| Running 3 | 06:00 | 17:06 | 05:23 +00:37 | 16:50 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 03:26 | 23:06 | 04:54 -01:28 | 22:13 +00:53 |
| Running 4 | 06:10 | 26:32 | 05:20 +00:50 | 27:07 -00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:59 | 32:42 | 05:17 -01:18 | 32:27 +00:15 |
| Running 5 | 06:21 | 36:41 | 05:30 +00:51 | 37:44 -01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 43:02 | 04:49 -00:15 | 43:14 -00:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 47:36 | 05:22 +00:22 | 48:03 -00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:25 | 53:20 | 02:10 -00:45 | 53:25 -00:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 54:45 | 05:21 +00:34 | 55:35 -00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:42 | 01:00:40 | 05:04 +01:38 | 01:00:56 -00:16 |
| Running 8 | 06:10 | 01:07:22 | 05:57 +00:13 | 01:06:00 +01:22 |
| Wall Balls | 05:30 | 01:13:32 | 06:28 -00:58 | 01:11:57 +01:35 |
| Roxzone | 06:21 | 01:25:14 | 06:49 -00:28 | 01:25:14 |
Mark's best running lap was 00:04:56, indicating that he has the potential to perform well in running segments.
To improve in the Run Total segment, Mark should focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. This can be achieved by incorporating interval training, such as sprints and hill repeats, into his training routine. Additionally, he can work on improving his agility and speed through ladder drills and plyometric exercises.
For the Sandbag Lunges segment, Mark should focus on building strength and endurance in his lower body. Exercises such as weighted lunges, squats, and step-ups can help improve his performance in this segment. It is also important for Mark to work on his technique and form during lunges to maximize efficiency and minimize energy expenditure.
In the Running 5, Running 4, Running 2, Running 3, Running 7, Running 1, and Running 6 segments, Mark should prioritize his running training. This can include long-distance runs to build endurance, interval training to improve speed, and hill training to enhance strength and power. Incorporating strength training exercises specific to running, such as single-leg squats and bounding exercises, can also be beneficial.
Mark should also strategize his transitions between segments to minimize time lost. Practicing efficient transitions during training can help improve his overall race performance. Additionally, he should pay attention to his form and technique during each segment to ensure optimal performance and minimize energy expenditure.
Overall, Mark should aim to strike a balance between improving his running performance and building strength and endurance in the areas where he had slower times compared to the average. Tailoring his training routine to address these specific areas of improvement will help him enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Barrette Ian | 2023 Chicago | 01:25:17 | |
| Destruels Mathieu | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:27 | |
| Völkel Torsten | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:25:20 | |
| Kraa Jelle | 2024 Maastricht | 01:25:12 | |
| Holst Florian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:25:03 | |
| Maraschin Marco | 2024 Rimini | 01:24:45 | |
| Schlüter Markus | 2019 Hamburg | 01:24:47 | |
| Noble Russell | 2023 Malaga | 01:25:16 | |
| Godino Antonio Jesus | 2024 Madrid | 01:24:51 | |
| Dunford Steve | 2023 Singapore | 01:25:00 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam Van Den Berg Mark | 01:31:50 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships Van Den Berg Mark | 01:21:58 | |
| 2022 Amsterdam Van Den Berg Mark | 01:38:20 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam Van Den Berg Mark | 01:20:11 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam Van Den Berg Mark | 01:57:37 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam Van Den Berg Mark | 01:34:08 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Van Den Berg Mark
