Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Malaga using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 791 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hill Natasha's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hill Natasha's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hill Natasha's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hill Natasha's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 10:40 to 06:22 | 65.0% |
| Run Total | 01:28 | 51:31 to 50:03 | 22.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:51 | 03:16 to 02:25 | 12.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:07 to 05:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Hill Natasha | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:32 | 00:00 | 05:29 +01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 06:32 | 05:19 -00:18 | 05:29 +01:03 |
| Running 2 | 06:24 | 11:33 | 06:01 +00:23 | 10:48 +00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 17:57 | 03:05 -00:34 | 16:49 +01:08 |
| Running 3 | 06:50 | 20:28 | 06:23 +00:27 | 19:54 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 10:40 | 27:18 | 06:32 +04:08 | 26:17 +01:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:24 | 37:58 | 06:26 -00:02 | 32:49 +05:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:21 | 44:22 | 07:16 -01:55 | 39:15 +05:07 |
| Running 5 | 06:48 | 49:43 | 06:36 +00:12 | 46:31 +03:12 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 56:31 | 05:38 -00:04 | 53:07 +03:24 |
| Running 6 | 06:20 | 01:02:05 | 06:29 -00:09 | 58:45 +03:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:16 | 01:08:25 | 02:30 +00:46 | 01:05:14 +03:11 |
| Running 7 | 06:05 | 01:11:41 | 06:27 -00:22 | 01:07:44 +03:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:07 | 01:17:46 | 05:35 -00:28 | 01:14:11 +03:35 |
| Running 8 | 06:12 | 01:22:53 | 07:10 -00:58 | 01:19:46 +03:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:10 | 01:29:05 | 05:52 -01:42 | 01:26:56 +02:09 |
| Roxzone | 07:57 | 01:41:03 | 08:15 -00:18 | 01:41:03 |
Natasha Hill showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Malaga HYROX, finishing in the top 10% of all athletes and top 11% in her age group. Her overall time was impressive, and her total running time was 21 seconds faster than average, highlighting her strong running capabilities. Natasha's performance can be characterized as that of a hybrid athlete, with a slight inclination towards running given her total running time. However, there is room for improvement in her strength-focused segments to achieve a more balanced performance. Notably, her pacing at the beginning showed room for optimization, as she started slower than average but improved significantly in later running segments.
By addressing these areas of improvement through targeted training and strategic race planning, Natasha Hill has the potential to significantly enhance her overall performance in future HYROX events. Balancing her strong running ability with improved strength and efficiency will make her a formidable competitor in her age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Teesselink Anne | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:40:57 | |
| Hardiman Alice | 2023 Birmingham | 01:41:25 | |
| 刘 澍宣 | 2024 Beijing | 01:41:26 | |
| Hayes Jacqui | 2024 Birmingham | 01:41:31 | |
| Maldonado Amanda | 2020 Chicago | 01:41:06 | |
| Brauer Saskia | 2023 Köln | 01:41:12 | |
| Silva Indira | 2023 Dallas | 01:40:51 | |
| Gardner Jasmine | 2024 Birmingham | 01:41:21 | |
| Lunkova Eva | 2018 Hamburg | 01:41:03 | |
| RodriguezPalacios Melanie | 2024 New York | 01:41:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
