Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gisness Eric's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gisness Eric's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gisness Eric's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gisness Eric's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:37 | 47:05 to 44:28 | 56.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:52 | 07:41 to 06:49 | 18.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:39 | 02:53 to 02:14 | 13.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 05:55 to 05:40 | 5.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 05:16 to 05:08 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:37 to 04:31 | 2.1% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:56 to 04:54 | 0.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:01 | 05:22 to 05:21 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:40 to 02:40 | 0.0% |
| Gisness Eric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 04:50 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 04:35 | 04:33 +00:04 | 04:50 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:21 | 09:12 | 05:18 +00:03 | 09:23 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 14:33 | 03:09 -00:29 | 14:41 -00:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 17:13 | 05:47 -00:11 | 17:50 -00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 05:16 | 22:49 | 05:23 -00:07 | 23:37 -00:48 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 28:05 | 05:46 -00:07 | 29:00 -00:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:55 | 33:44 | 06:00 -00:05 | 34:46 -01:02 |
| Running 5 | 06:13 | 39:39 | 05:57 +00:16 | 40:46 -01:07 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 45:52 | 04:58 -00:02 | 46:43 -00:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:49 | 50:48 | 05:48 +00:01 | 51:41 -00:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:53 | 56:37 | 02:22 +00:31 | 57:29 -00:52 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 59:30 | 05:46 +00:12 | 59:51 -00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:22 | 01:05:28 | 05:36 -00:14 | 01:05:37 -00:09 |
| Running 8 | 07:58 | 01:10:50 | 06:33 +01:25 | 01:11:13 -00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 07:41 | 01:18:48 | 07:15 +00:26 | 01:17:46 +01:02 |
| Roxzone | 06:25 | 01:32:45 | 07:44 -01:19 | 01:32:45 |
Eric Gisness delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Singapore Hyrox race, ranking in the top 26% overall and the top 28% within his age group. This showcases his competitive edge and proficiency in a mixed-discipline event. Analyzing his pacing, Eric demonstrated a tendency to start strong with faster initial running segments, but his pace waned in the latter part of the race, indicating a possible need for improved endurance or energy management. His total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting that Eric might have a more hybrid profile, balancing both strength and endurance aspects effectively.
By focusing on these targeted areas for improvement and implementing strategic race-day tactics, Eric can significantly enhance his Hyrox race performance and continue to climb the ranks in future competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brauer Sebastian | 2019 Hamburg | 01:32:58 | |
| Mascaro Salmeron Oscar | 2022 Valencia | 01:33:02 | |
| Marino Francesco | 2024 Rimini | 01:32:37 | |
| Berrou Kevin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:32:53 | |
| Böhme Sven | 2023 Köln | 01:32:45 | |
| Chia Steve | 2024 Singapore | 01:33:08 | |
| Lopez Maldonado Oscar | 2024 Mexico City | 01:33:01 | |
| Manthey Tom | 2023 Hamburg | 01:32:52 | |
| Henseler Kai | 2023 Hamburg | 01:32:54 | |
| Demasi Bruno | 2024 Milan | 01:32:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
