Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Fugers Cris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Fugers Cris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Fugers Cris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Fugers Cris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:46 | 40:50 to 39:04 | 32.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:31 | 05:56 to 04:25 | 28.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:39 | 04:54 to 04:15 | 12.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 04:49 to 04:12 | 11.5% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 05:01 to 04:35 | 8.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:24 | 04:46 to 04:22 | 7.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:24 to 02:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:18 to 01:18 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Fugers Cris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:23 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:54 | 03:23 | 04:21 +00:33 | 04:22 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 08:17 | 04:43 +00:07 | 08:43 -00:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:24 | 13:07 | 02:43 -00:19 | 13:26 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:12 | 15:31 | 05:05 +00:07 | 16:09 -00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 20:43 | 04:32 +00:17 | 21:14 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:15 | 25:32 | 05:05 +00:10 | 25:46 -00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:56 | 30:47 | 04:48 +01:08 | 30:51 -00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:29 | 36:43 | 05:13 +00:16 | 35:39 +01:04 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 42:12 | 04:40 +00:21 | 40:52 +01:20 |
| Running 6 | 05:13 | 47:13 | 05:06 +00:07 | 45:32 +01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:18 | 52:26 | 02:02 -00:44 | 50:38 +01:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 53:44 | 05:04 +00:26 | 52:40 +01:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:46 | 59:14 | 04:40 +00:06 | 57:44 +01:30 |
| Running 8 | 06:01 | 01:04:00 | 05:33 +00:28 | 01:02:24 +01:36 |
| Wall Balls | 04:44 | 01:10:01 | 05:54 -01:10 | 01:07:57 +02:04 |
| Roxzone | 05:20 | 01:19:58 | 06:07 -00:47 | 01:19:58 |
Cris Fugers delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 703 out of 3118 participants, placing him in the top 22%. Within his age group (25-29), Cris ranked 156th, demonstrating a strong competitive edge. His overall time was 01:19:58, with a total running time that was 00:16 slower than average, suggesting a need for improved running efficiency. Cris started the race with a strong pace, evidenced by a significantly faster Running 1 segment, but displayed a decline in running efficiency in subsequent segments, indicating an initial pace that may have been too fast. Overall, Cris exhibits a balanced performance profile with a slight inclination toward strength activities, as evidenced by his strong performances in segments such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Harding Dan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:14 | |
| Manabe Yoshi | 2023 Singapore | 01:20:20 | |
| Vera Mateos Markel | 2023 Bilbao | 01:20:23 | |
| Opdam Michel | 2023 Malmö | 01:19:37 | |
| Chaterclark George | 2024 Malaga | 01:19:44 | |
| Fidgett Adam | 2022 London | 01:20:25 | |
| Kube Dennis | 2022 Maastricht | 01:20:25 | |
| Mcconville Peter | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:24 | |
| Silva John | 2023 Melbourne | 01:19:43 | |
| Resendiz Luis | 2024 Dallas | 01:20:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
