Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chubb Chris's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chubb Chris's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chubb Chris's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chubb Chris's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:18. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:46 | 07:46 to 05:00 | 52.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:20 | 07:23 to 06:03 | 25.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 05:00 to 04:38 | 6.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 05:11 to 04:50 | 6.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:57 to 02:42 | 4.7% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:57 to 04:44 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:24 to 04:23 | 0.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:57 to 01:57 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:30 to 38:30 | 0.0% |
| Chubb Chris | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:42 | 00:00 | 04:37 +01:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 05:42 | 04:27 -00:03 | 04:37 +01:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 10:06 | 04:58 -00:16 | 09:04 +01:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:57 | 14:48 | 02:55 +00:02 | 14:02 +00:46 |
| Running 3 | 04:54 | 17:45 | 05:24 -00:30 | 16:57 +00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 05:00 | 22:39 | 04:58 +00:02 | 22:21 +00:18 |
| Running 4 | 04:43 | 27:39 | 05:23 -00:40 | 27:19 +00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:46 | 32:22 | 05:20 +02:26 | 32:42 -00:20 |
| Running 5 | 04:39 | 40:08 | 05:33 -00:54 | 38:02 +02:06 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 44:47 | 04:49 +00:08 | 43:35 +01:12 |
| Running 6 | 04:32 | 49:44 | 05:25 -00:53 | 48:24 +01:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 54:16 | 02:11 -00:14 | 53:49 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 04:36 | 56:13 | 05:24 -00:48 | 56:00 +00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:00:49 | 05:07 +00:04 | 01:01:24 -00:35 |
| Running 8 | 04:46 | 01:06:00 | 06:01 -01:15 | 01:06:31 -00:31 |
| Wall Balls | 07:23 | 01:10:46 | 06:32 +00:51 | 01:12:32 -01:46 |
| Roxzone | 07:58 | 01:25:57 | 06:53 +01:05 | 01:25:57 |
Chris Chubb showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event, ranking in the top 34% of all athletes and top 32% in his age group. His overall time was 01:25:57, with a total running time of 00:38:30 which was 04:32 faster than average, highlighting his strength in running.
Starting with Running 1, Chris began a bit slower than average but quickly picked up his pace in the following running segments. This indicates a strong endurance base and the ability to maintain a fast pace throughout the race.
His performance across the strength segments of the race was generally average, with some room for improvement. His Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating that he might have taken more rests or transitions between the exercise zones.
Based on his performance, Chris should consider the following strategies in future races:
With a focused training approach, Chris has the potential to significantly improve his performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gough Jack | 2023 Birmingham | 01:26:06 | |
| Hodson Jacob | 2024 Sydney | 01:26:18 | |
| Hones Nathan | 2024 Dubai | 01:26:13 | |
| Bellafont Deltoro Agustin | 2023 Bilbao | 01:26:11 | |
| Geller Philipp | 2022 Hamburg | 01:25:38 | |
| Norville Kevin | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:26:05 | |
| Cortes Pablo | 2024 Mexico City | 01:26:05 | |
| Kochbati Radhouen | 2023 Barcelona | 01:25:44 | |
| Rhodes Sean | 2023 London | 01:26:05 | |
| Dias João Vieira | 2024 Madrid | 01:26:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 London | 01:22:28 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
