Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 694 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chick Beth's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chick Beth's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chick Beth's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chick Beth's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:55 | 10:28 to 07:33 | 52.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:14 | 06:56 to 05:42 | 22.4% |
| Wall Balls | 01:12 | 07:20 to 06:08 | 21.8% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:52 to 05:42 | 3.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 50:56 to 50:56 | 0.0% |
| Chick Beth | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:32 | 00:00 | 05:44 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:22 | 06:32 | 05:23 -00:01 | 05:44 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 05:53 | 11:54 | 06:11 -00:18 | 11:07 +00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:12 | 17:47 | 03:09 -00:57 | 17:18 +00:29 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 19:59 | 06:35 -00:23 | 20:27 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:35 | 26:11 | 06:45 -01:10 | 27:02 -00:51 |
| Running 4 | 06:28 | 31:46 | 06:36 -00:08 | 33:47 -02:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:28 | 38:14 | 07:45 +02:43 | 40:23 -02:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 48:42 | 06:52 -00:18 | 48:08 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 05:52 | 55:16 | 05:43 +00:09 | 55:00 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 06:06 | 01:01:08 | 06:45 -00:39 | 01:00:43 +00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 01:07:14 | 02:33 -00:17 | 01:07:28 -00:14 |
| Running 7 | 06:17 | 01:09:30 | 06:42 -00:25 | 01:10:01 -00:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:56 | 01:15:47 | 05:50 +01:06 | 01:16:43 -00:56 |
| Running 8 | 06:57 | 01:22:43 | 07:27 -00:30 | 01:22:33 +00:10 |
| Wall Balls | 07:20 | 01:29:40 | 06:19 +01:01 | 01:30:00 -00:20 |
| Roxzone | 08:10 | 01:45:04 | 08:45 -00:35 | 01:45:04 |
Beth Chick showcased a strong performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. A clearly skilled runner, she completed the total running time in 00:50:56, which was 02:25 faster than the average time. This demonstrates that she is adept at endurance-based activities and has an impressive running profile. However, her strength exercises could be improved to enhance her overall performance.
Her pacing throughout the race was generally consistent, with the majority of her running segments being completed faster than the average times. However, she seemed to start the race slightly slower, with her first run being 00:52 slower than average. This could suggest a cautious start or slower initial pacing, which she might want to address in her training.
Going forward, Beth should consider implementing the following strategies during her races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 김 예은 | 2024 Incheon | 01:45:04 | |
| Hundertmark Laura | 2024 Brisbane | 01:44:47 | |
| Dale Tina | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:45:33 | |
| Van Der Linden Karin | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:44:53 | |
| Mcdevitt Melanie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:41 | |
| Miller Olivia | 2022 Dallas | 01:44:36 | |
| Bino Giorgia | 2024 Milan | 01:44:48 | |
| Coeleveld Katja | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:44:37 | |
| Brown Trudy | 2023 Melbourne | 01:45:24 | |
| Cordova Melissa | 2023 New York | 01:45:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:35:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
