Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Stuttgart using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Suess Nadine's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Suess Nadine's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Suess Nadine's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Suess Nadine's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:52 | 06:36 to 04:44 | 42.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:16 | 06:01 to 04:45 | 28.6% |
| Run Total | 00:56 | 47:09 to 46:13 | 21.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 03:02 to 02:40 | 8.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Suess Nadine | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:49 | 00:00 | 05:13 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 05:49 | 05:10 -00:24 | 05:13 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 10:35 | 05:35 -00:02 | 10:23 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:02 | 16:08 | 02:49 +00:13 | 15:58 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:43 | 19:10 | 05:51 -00:08 | 18:47 +00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:44 | 24:53 | 05:58 -01:14 | 24:38 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 29:37 | 05:54 -00:04 | 30:36 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:54 | 35:27 | 06:25 -01:31 | 36:30 -01:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 40:21 | 06:04 -00:12 | 42:55 -02:34 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 46:13 | 05:27 -00:22 | 48:59 -02:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 51:18 | 05:56 -00:10 | 54:26 -03:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 57:04 | 02:19 -00:12 | 01:00:22 -03:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:54 | 59:11 | 05:55 -00:01 | 01:02:41 -03:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 01:05:05 | 04:59 +01:02 | 01:08:36 -03:31 |
| Running 8 | 06:46 | 01:11:06 | 06:24 +00:22 | 01:13:35 -02:29 |
| Wall Balls | 06:36 | 01:17:52 | 05:14 +01:22 | 01:19:59 -02:07 |
| Roxzone | 08:02 | 01:32:23 | 07:10 +00:52 | 01:32:23 |
Nadine Suess delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Stuttgart Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 194, which places her in the top 17% among 1130 athletes. In her age group, she ranked 47th, placing her in the top 20% of 231 competitors. Her overall time was 01:32:23, with a total running time of 00:47:09, which is notably 00:23 faster than the average. This indicates a strong running profile, suggesting she excels more in running than in strength-based exercises. However, her pacing strategy may have been slightly off, as indicated by the slower start in Running 1, which was 00:42 slower than average, suggesting a conservative start.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Carmichael Kristyn | 2024 Dallas | 01:32:40 | |
| Leishman Kerry | 2024 Birmingham | 01:31:59 | |
| Marcolongo Elisa | 2024 Milan | 01:32:16 | |
| Buys Susan | 2024 Cape Town | 01:32:43 | |
| Meyers Kimberley | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:32:33 | |
| Kaur Kam | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:32:20 | |
| Charnock Vicki | 2024 London | 01:32:13 | |
| Nedlahcen Selma | 2024 Maastricht | 01:32:32 | |
| Escobar López Rosy | 2023 Malaga | 01:31:55 | |
| Splieth Marie | 2022 Hamburg | 01:32:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Dublin | 01:42:55 | |
| 2023 München | 01:30:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
