Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Miles Laura's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Miles Laura's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Miles Laura's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Miles Laura's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:00 | 07:08 to 05:08 | 38.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:26 | 07:56 to 06:30 | 27.7% |
| Rowing | 00:47 | 06:14 to 05:27 | 15.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:19 | 05:21 to 05:02 | 6.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:18 | 06:12 to 05:54 | 5.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:33 to 02:17 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 05:16 to 05:11 | 1.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:03 to 45:03 | 0.0% |
| Miles Laura | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:29 | 00:00 | 05:25 +00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:16 | 05:29 | 05:14 +00:02 | 05:25 +00:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 10:45 | 05:46 -00:19 | 10:39 +00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 16:12 | 02:55 -00:12 | 16:25 -00:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:46 | 18:55 | 06:05 -00:19 | 19:20 -00:25 |
| Sled Pull | 06:12 | 24:41 | 06:12 +00:00 | 25:25 -00:44 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 30:53 | 06:06 -00:14 | 31:37 -00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:56 | 36:45 | 06:52 +01:04 | 37:43 -00:58 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 44:41 | 06:16 -00:29 | 44:35 +00:06 |
| Rowing | 06:14 | 50:28 | 05:31 +00:43 | 50:51 -00:23 |
| Running 6 | 05:27 | 56:42 | 06:10 -00:43 | 56:22 +00:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 01:02:09 | 02:25 +00:08 | 01:02:32 -00:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:28 | 01:04:42 | 06:09 -00:41 | 01:04:57 -00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:21 | 01:10:10 | 05:14 +00:07 | 01:11:06 -00:56 |
| Running 8 | 05:50 | 01:15:31 | 06:41 -00:51 | 01:16:20 -00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 07:08 | 01:21:21 | 05:31 +01:37 | 01:23:01 -01:40 |
| Roxzone | 07:47 | 01:36:09 | 07:37 +00:10 | 01:36:09 |
Laura Miles showcased an impressive performance in the 2024 Hamburg Hyrox race. Her overall rank of 359 out of 1853 athletes and her ranking of 95 in her age group (30-34 years) is commendable. One of the key highlights of her performance was her total running time, which was 04:02 faster than the average. This indicates that Laura has a strong runner's profile. However, her performance in the roxzone was 00:12 slower than the average, suggesting that she took more rest or transition time. When analyzing her pacing, it appears Laura started slightly slower than average in the first running segment but consistently improved her speed in each subsequent running segment. This is a good strategy, indicating she didn't burn out early in the race by starting too fast.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nolan Joanne | 2023 Dublin | 01:36:05 | |
| Van Der Corput Nikki | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:47 | |
| Priest Annette | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:36:22 | |
| Maloteau Margot | 2024 Maastricht | 01:35:40 | |
| Eatherington Zoe | 2022 Birmingham | 01:36:32 | |
| Odunlami Hannah | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:36:25 | |
| Gestwicka Anna | 2022 London | 01:36:23 | |
| Engel Sandra | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:26 | |
| Contreras Ashley | 2024 Houston | 01:35:49 | |
| Maronde Pia | 2018 Essen | 01:36:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
