Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Proctor Adam's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Proctor Adam's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Proctor Adam's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Proctor Adam's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:18 | 41:57 to 40:39 | 45.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:13 | 05:51 to 04:38 | 42.9% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 04:56 to 04:40 | 9.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:02 to 01:59 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Proctor Adam | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:58 | 00:00 | 04:31 +00:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 04:58 | 04:24 -00:06 | 04:31 +00:27 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 09:16 | 04:52 +00:00 | 08:55 +00:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 14:08 | 02:51 -00:23 | 13:47 +00:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:14 | 16:36 | 05:17 -00:03 | 16:38 -00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 21:50 | 04:46 -00:28 | 21:55 -00:05 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 26:08 | 05:15 +00:02 | 26:41 -00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:35 | 31:25 | 05:04 -00:29 | 31:56 -00:31 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 36:00 | 05:25 -00:03 | 37:00 -01:00 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 41:22 | 04:45 +00:11 | 42:25 -01:03 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 46:18 | 05:17 +00:00 | 47:10 -00:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 51:35 | 02:08 -00:06 | 52:27 -00:52 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 53:37 | 05:16 +00:00 | 54:35 -00:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:51 | 58:53 | 04:56 +00:55 | 59:51 -00:58 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 01:04:44 | 05:49 -00:05 | 01:04:47 -00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:01 | 01:10:28 | 06:17 -01:16 | 01:10:36 -00:08 |
| Roxzone | 08:01 | 01:23:24 | 06:31 +01:30 | 01:23:24 |
Adam Proctor delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX event, finishing with an overall rank of 470, placing him in the top 26% of all competitors. His performance in the age group category (40-44) was equally impressive, ranking 73rd, which puts him in the top 23% of his peers. Adam's total time was 01:23:24, with a total running time of 00:41:57, which is 00:07 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. However, his pacing strategy at the start could be optimized, as he started slower than average in the first running segment (Running 1: 00:04:58). His transition times in the Roxzone were notably slower, suggesting areas for improvement in overall fitness and transition efficiency, which could enhance his hybrid athlete profile.
Adam spent significantly more time in the Roxzone, which suggests a need to improve transition efficiency and overall fitness. To address this:
This segment was a particular challenge, indicating a need to build lower body strength and endurance.
While not as critical, improving rowing efficiency could shave valuable seconds off your time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chappat Anthony | 2023 Dublin | 01:23:47 | |
| Perano Enrico | 2024 Milan | 01:23:36 | |
| Dzhafarov Ruslan | 2024 Dubai | 01:23:27 | |
| Gooding Alexander | 2021 New York | 01:23:13 | |
| Ortiz Sergio | 2024 Dallas | 01:23:29 | |
| Gandoglia Edoardo | 2019 Hamburg | 01:23:13 | |
| Buckley Andrew | 2023 Madrid | 01:23:08 | |
| Watson Chance | 2023 Dallas | 01:23:52 | |
| Veall Andy | 2023 Dubai | 01:23:54 | |
| Gillespie Ross | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
