Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Stockholm using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 513 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Tillegrd Emelie's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Tillegrd Emelie hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Tillegrd Emelie’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tillegrd Emelie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:57 | 42:48 to 37:51 | 97.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:48 to 01:44 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:39 to 04:37 | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 01:55 to 01:54 | 0.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:00 to 03:00 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:31 to 02:31 | 0.0% |
| Tillegrd Emelie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 04:19 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 04:20 | 04:45 -00:06 | 04:19 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 08:59 | 04:36 +00:19 | 09:04 -00:05 |
| Sled Push | 01:55 | 13:54 | 02:16 -00:21 | 13:40 +00:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 15:49 | 04:50 +00:30 | 15:56 -00:07 |
| Sled Pull | 04:03 | 21:09 | 04:31 -00:28 | 20:46 +00:23 |
| Running 4 | 05:28 | 25:12 | 04:51 +00:37 | 25:17 -00:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:35 | 30:40 | 04:25 -00:50 | 30:08 +00:32 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 34:15 | 04:57 +00:36 | 34:33 -00:18 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 39:48 | 04:56 -00:16 | 39:30 +00:18 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 44:28 | 04:53 +00:44 | 44:26 +00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 50:05 | 01:53 -00:05 | 49:19 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:36 | 51:53 | 04:52 +00:44 | 51:12 +00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:00 | 57:29 | 03:41 -00:41 | 56:04 +01:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:00:29 | 05:06 +00:57 | 59:45 +00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 02:31 | 01:06:32 | 03:41 -01:10 | 01:04:51 +01:41 |
| Roxzone | 04:35 | 01:13:29 | 04:57 -00:22 | 01:13:29 |
Emelie's total running time of 00:42:48 was 05:22 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may benefit from focusing on improving her running speed and endurance. Additionally, her best running lap was 00:04:20, which was 00:12 slower than the average. This suggests that she may have started the race at a slightly slower pace than necessary, impacting her overall running performance.
In conclusion, Emelie Tillegrd demonstrated excellent performance in the Hyrox race, achieving a top rank in her age group and overall. By focusing on improving her running speed and endurance, implementing specific training strategies, and refining her race strategies, Emelie can further enhance her performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Olson Deanna | 2024 London | 01:13:09 | |
| Savegnago Mathilda | 2024 Rimini | 01:13:54 | |
| Alford Pippa | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:13:32 | |
| Zaiser Elena | 2024 Köln | 01:13:47 | |
| Meloni Claudia | 2024 Turin | 01:13:02 | |
| Bernabe Gamo Paula | 2023 Bilbao | 01:13:30 | |
| Weise Annkathrin | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:13:26 | |
| Bonetti Margherita | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:13:40 | |
| Becker Coralie | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:13:57 | |
| Patterson Ginny | 2022 Dallas | 01:13:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
