Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cush Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cush Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cush Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cush Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:22 | 07:28 to 05:06 | 58.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:32 | 02:50 to 02:18 | 13.1% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 04:56 to 04:30 | 10.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:06 to 01:47 | 7.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 04:25 to 04:07 | 7.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:19 to 04:11 | 3.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:45 to 03:45 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:04 to 37:04 | 0.0% |
| Cush Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 04:16 +00:35 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 04:51 | 04:19 +00:00 | 04:16 +00:35 |
| Running 2 | 04:25 | 09:10 | 04:34 -00:09 | 08:35 +00:35 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 13:35 | 02:37 +00:13 | 13:09 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 04:30 | 16:25 | 04:56 -00:26 | 15:46 +00:39 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 20:55 | 04:21 -00:28 | 20:42 +00:13 |
| Running 4 | 04:32 | 24:48 | 04:54 -00:22 | 25:03 -00:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:25 | 29:20 | 04:34 -00:09 | 29:57 -00:37 |
| Running 5 | 04:34 | 33:45 | 05:02 -00:28 | 34:31 -00:46 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 38:19 | 04:37 +00:19 | 39:33 -01:14 |
| Running 6 | 04:38 | 43:15 | 04:56 -00:18 | 44:10 -00:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 47:53 | 01:59 +00:07 | 49:06 -01:13 |
| Running 7 | 04:40 | 49:59 | 04:54 -00:14 | 51:05 -01:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:45 | 54:39 | 04:29 -00:44 | 55:59 -01:20 |
| Running 8 | 04:58 | 58:24 | 05:21 -00:23 | 01:00:28 -02:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:28 | 01:03:22 | 05:40 +01:48 | 01:05:49 -02:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:35 | 01:17:17 | 05:48 +00:47 | 01:17:17 |
Tom Cush demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. His overall rank of 692, placing him in the top 16% of 4107 athletes, and a rank of 29 in his age group, the top 7% of 386 athletes, are clear indicators of his competitive prowess.
His overall time was 01:17:17, with a total running time of 00:37:04 which was 02:04 faster than the average running time for his finishers group. This suggests that Tom's running abilities are a significant strength in his performance, indicating a runner profile.
However, the analysis of his splits suggests that he started slightly slower than average in the first running segment but managed to progressively improve his time in the subsequent running segments. This indicates a good pacing strategy, gradually increasing his speed throughout the race.
Given Tom's performance and potential areas of improvement, here are some strategies to improve his race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| GERARD LUDOVIC | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:17:24 | |
| Krzywinski Thomas | 2020 Hannover | 01:17:32 | |
| Ekholm Daniel | 2023 Stockholm | 01:17:32 | |
| Wellems Peter | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:16:59 | |
| Fox Joshua | 2021 Dallas | 01:17:31 | |
| Höhn Jürgen | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:17:05 | |
| Boswell Jonathan | 2024 London | 01:17:35 | |
| Sully Matthew | 2024 Perth | 01:17:36 | |
| Kooistra Scott | 2024 New York | 01:16:49 | |
| Antonaglia Stefano | 2024 Turin | 01:17:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:09:42 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:19:35 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:17:18 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:20:31 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:10 | |
| 2023 London | 01:27:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
