Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rotterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 198 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Garcia Santana Eliana's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Garcia Santana Eliana's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Garcia Santana Eliana's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Garcia Santana Eliana's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 13:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 12:00 | 20:12 to 08:12 | 88.3% |
| Ski Erg | 01:07 | 06:52 to 05:45 | 8.2% |
| Rowing | 00:28 | 06:37 to 06:09 | 3.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:35 to 03:35 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:47 to 06:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:52 to 05:52 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:33 to 06:33 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 58:30 to 58:30 | 0.0% |
| Garcia Santana Eliana | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:00 | 00:00 | 06:16 -02:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 06:52 | 04:00 | 05:41 +01:11 | 06:16 -02:16 |
| Running 2 | 06:33 | 10:52 | 07:10 -00:37 | 11:57 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 03:35 | 17:25 | 03:36 -00:01 | 19:07 -01:42 |
| Running 3 | 08:18 | 21:00 | 07:45 +00:33 | 22:43 -01:43 |
| Sled Pull | 20:12 | 29:18 | 08:12 +12:00 | 30:28 -01:10 |
| Running 4 | 07:42 | 49:30 | 07:59 -00:17 | 38:40 +10:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:47 | 57:12 | 10:27 -03:40 | 46:39 +10:33 |
| Running 5 | 07:46 | 01:03:59 | 08:19 -00:33 | 57:06 +06:53 |
| Rowing | 06:37 | 01:11:45 | 06:11 +00:26 | 01:05:25 +06:20 |
| Running 6 | 07:18 | 01:18:22 | 08:03 -00:45 | 01:11:36 +06:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 01:25:40 | 02:56 -00:34 | 01:19:39 +06:01 |
| Running 7 | 08:31 | 01:28:02 | 08:02 +00:29 | 01:22:35 +05:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:52 | 01:36:33 | 07:24 -01:32 | 01:30:37 +05:56 |
| Running 8 | 08:25 | 01:42:25 | 09:09 -00:44 | 01:38:01 +04:24 |
| Wall Balls | 06:33 | 01:50:50 | 08:16 -01:43 | 01:47:10 +03:40 |
| Roxzone | 08:19 | 02:05:34 | 10:08 -01:49 | 02:05:34 |
In conclusion, Eliana Garcia Santana performed well in the Hyrox race in Rotterdam, but there are areas that can be improved to enhance her overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as building upper body and grip strength for the sled pull, incorporating skiing-specific drills for the Ski Erg segment, and working on endurance and speed for running segments, Eliana can further improve her performance in future races. Additionally, implementing effective race strategies, maintaining a consistent pace, and optimizing transitions can contribute to better overall results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mandolesi Ilaria | 2024 Milan | 02:05:23 | |
| Rau Katja | 2023 Köln | 02:05:04 | |
| Janisse Reka | 2024 Dallas | 02:05:43 | |
| Baird Allyson | 2024 Glasgow | 02:06:04 | |
| Boyd Georgia | 2024 London | 02:05:05 | |
| Lord Coach | 2022 New York | 02:05:15 | |
| Gould Rachael | 2024 Madrid | 02:05:52 | |
| Kalverda Marieke | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:05:46 | |
| Bowlen Brandy | 2023 Dallas | 02:06:01 | |
| Mudukuti Angela | 2021 Berlin | 02:05:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
