Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ballard Grant's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ballard Grant's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ballard Grant's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ballard Grant's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:25 | 08:44 to 05:19 | 58.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:57 | 05:15 to 04:18 | 16.1% |
| Run Total | 00:54 | 39:36 to 38:42 | 15.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:31 | 02:22 to 01:51 | 8.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:06 | 04:14 to 04:08 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Ballard Grant | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:17 | 00:00 | 04:20 -01:03 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:17 | 04:20 -00:08 | 04:20 -01:03 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 07:29 | 04:41 +00:09 | 08:40 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:01 | 12:19 | 02:41 -00:40 | 13:21 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 14:20 | 05:05 +00:15 | 16:02 -01:42 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 19:40 | 04:30 -00:16 | 21:07 -01:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:07 | 23:54 | 05:04 +00:03 | 25:37 -01:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:55 | 29:01 | 04:46 -00:51 | 30:41 -01:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:17 | 32:56 | 05:12 +00:05 | 35:27 -02:31 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 38:13 | 04:40 -00:16 | 40:39 -02:26 |
| Running 6 | 05:13 | 42:37 | 05:04 +00:09 | 45:19 -02:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 47:50 | 02:01 +00:21 | 50:23 -02:33 |
| Running 7 | 04:48 | 50:12 | 05:03 -00:15 | 52:24 -02:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:15 | 55:00 | 04:38 +00:37 | 57:27 -02:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:00:15 | 05:32 +00:15 | 01:02:05 -01:50 |
| Wall Balls | 08:44 | 01:06:02 | 05:51 +02:53 | 01:07:37 -01:35 |
| Roxzone | 04:52 | 01:19:31 | 06:03 -01:11 | 01:19:31 |
Grant Ballard, competing in HYROX's 30-34 age group, demonstrated a commendable overall performance in the 2024 Manchester event. With an overall rank of 567, Grant falls within the top 47% of athletes. Within his age group, he ranks 152, placing him in the top 53% of his peers.
Grant's total running time was faster than the average, indicating a stronger profile in running. His best running lap was completed in 00:04:48, which is outstanding. Furthermore, his performance in the roxzone was faster than the average, suggesting that his transition time and overall fitness are in good shape. However, his pacing could use some improvement. He started off faster than the average in the first running segment but slowed down in subsequent segments.
For better race performance, Grant should consider implementing the following strategies:
In conclusion, Grant Ballard is a skilled athlete with a strong running profile. By focusing on the suggested improvements and strategies, he can elevate his performance in future HYROX events.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schnabel Peter | 2019 Hannover | 01:19:15 | |
| Eleiwi Maad | 2024 Maastricht | 01:19:12 | |
| Grard Romain | 2023 Paris | 01:19:41 | |
| Segatto Gianluca | 2024 Rimini | 01:19:31 | |
| Labach Jonathan | 2023 Dallas | 01:19:08 | |
| Abascal Alonso Antonio | 2023 Madrid | 01:19:07 | |
| Schiebel Fabian | 2022 Berlin | 01:19:15 | |
| Udabe Aitor | 2024 Bilbao | 01:19:26 | |
| Pantelic Milos | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:19:32 | |
| Schönemann Laurin | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:55 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
