Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire O'Flynn Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O'Flynn Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O'Flynn Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O'Flynn Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:26 | 09:20 to 05:54 | 49.2% |
| Run Total | 02:05 | 47:32 to 45:27 | 29.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 06:12 to 05:19 | 12.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 06:06 to 05:33 | 7.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:36 to 04:34 | 0.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:41 to 02:41 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:51 to 04:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:39 to 06:39 | 0.0% |
| O'Flynn Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:24 | 00:00 | 04:56 -01:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:36 | 03:24 | 04:34 +00:02 | 04:56 -01:32 |
| Running 2 | 05:28 | 08:00 | 05:23 +00:05 | 09:30 -01:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 13:28 | 03:11 -00:30 | 14:53 -01:25 |
| Running 3 | 06:48 | 16:09 | 05:53 +00:55 | 18:04 -01:55 |
| Sled Pull | 06:12 | 22:57 | 05:31 +00:41 | 23:57 -01:00 |
| Running 4 | 06:43 | 29:09 | 05:52 +00:51 | 29:28 -00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:20 | 35:52 | 06:09 +03:11 | 35:20 +00:32 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 45:12 | 06:04 +00:30 | 41:29 +03:43 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 51:46 | 05:01 -00:10 | 47:33 +04:13 |
| Running 6 | 06:44 | 56:37 | 05:54 +00:50 | 52:34 +04:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:45 | 01:03:21 | 02:24 -00:39 | 58:28 +04:53 |
| Running 7 | 06:51 | 01:05:06 | 05:53 +00:58 | 01:00:52 +04:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:06 | 01:11:57 | 05:46 +00:20 | 01:06:45 +05:12 |
| Running 8 | 05:03 | 01:18:03 | 06:44 -01:41 | 01:12:31 +05:32 |
| Wall Balls | 06:39 | 01:23:06 | 07:25 -00:46 | 01:19:15 +03:51 |
| Roxzone | 05:02 | 01:34:39 | 07:59 -02:57 | 01:34:39 |
Tim O'Flynn demonstrated a commendable performance in the HYROX event. His overall rank places him in the top 49% of all athletes and the top 57% in his age group, 35-39. His strength lies in his running ability, as indicated by his first and last running segments, which are significantly faster than the average. However, his total running time, at 00:47:32, was slightly slower than average. This suggests that O'Flynn has a tendency to start strong and finish strong, but may lose steam in the middle sections of the race.
A notable aspect of O'Flynn's performance was his excellent transitions, as indicated by his roxzone time of 00:05:02, which is 02:52 faster than the average. This suggests an efficient transition strategy and good overall fitness. Despite these strengths, there is room for improvement, particularly in the areas of Burpees Broad Jump, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges.
To improve his performance in future races, O'Flynn should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Höfer Matthias | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:34:40 | |
| Peteri Jani | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:34:46 | |
| Diaz Romero De La Cruz Javier | 2022 Madrid | 01:35:09 | |
| Lehmann Oliver | 2020 Hannover | 01:34:54 | |
| Leow Dean | 2022 London | 01:34:57 | |
| Rayner James | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:34:25 | |
| Nicholson Matt | 2023 Glasgow | 01:34:33 | |
| Avitabile Peter | 2023 New York | 01:35:00 | |
| Driller Carlos | 2019 Hamburg | 01:34:49 | |
| Prestinenzi Luigi | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
