Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Keogh Neil's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Keogh Neil's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Keogh Neil's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Keogh Neil's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:31 | 09:51 to 06:20 | 50.7% |
| Wall Balls | 02:01 | 09:37 to 07:36 | 29.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:14 | 07:08 to 05:54 | 17.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:06 | 02:33 to 02:27 | 1.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 03:21 to 03:18 | 0.7% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:04 to 05:03 | 0.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:59 to 42:59 | 0.0% |
| Keogh Neil | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:43 | 00:00 | 05:03 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:43 | 04:38 -00:10 | 05:03 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 10:11 | 05:31 -00:30 | 09:41 +00:30 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 15:12 | 03:18 +00:03 | 15:12 +00:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:07 | 18:33 | 06:02 -00:55 | 18:30 +00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 05:11 | 23:40 | 05:45 -00:34 | 24:32 -00:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:17 | 28:51 | 06:01 -00:44 | 30:17 -01:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:51 | 34:08 | 06:34 +03:17 | 36:18 -02:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:18 | 43:59 | 06:16 -00:58 | 42:52 +01:07 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 49:17 | 05:07 -00:03 | 49:08 +00:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:23 | 54:21 | 06:06 -00:43 | 54:15 +00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 59:44 | 02:30 +00:03 | 01:00:21 -00:37 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 01:02:17 | 06:04 -00:51 | 01:02:51 -00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:08 | 01:07:30 | 06:09 +00:59 | 01:08:55 -01:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:00 | 01:14:38 | 07:04 -01:04 | 01:15:04 -00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 09:37 | 01:20:38 | 07:51 +01:46 | 01:22:08 -01:30 |
| Roxzone | 08:18 | 01:38:27 | 08:28 -00:10 | 01:38:27 |
Neil Keogh's performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox Race was commendable, placing him in the top 52% of all athletes and the top 51% within his age group of 40-44. His strongest asset was his running, with a total running time of 00:42:59, which was 05:21 faster than the average. This indicates that Neil has a strong runner's profile and he managed to maintain a consistent pace throughout the race. His performance in the skiing, sled pull, and rowing segments were also above average, further highlighting his endurance and strength.
While Neil showed solid running and endurance capabilities, there were some areas where he lost time compared to the average. Specifically:
For future races, Neil should focus on the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Minter Matt | 2024 Birmingham | 01:38:31 | |
| Bos Patrick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:38:03 | |
| Stortoni Mattia | 2024 Rimini | 01:38:48 | |
| Georgitso Adam | 2021 Dallas | 01:38:19 | |
| Marlon Otniel | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:38:46 | |
| Robinson David | 2024 Brisbane | 01:38:48 | |
| Yin Barry | 2022 London | 01:38:44 | |
| Desouza Evans | 2021 New York | 01:38:20 | |
| Justa Christian | 2019 Hamburg | 01:38:08 | |
| Ferrao Ben | 2022 London | 01:38:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
