Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Godsmark Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Godsmark Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Godsmark Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Godsmark Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:16 | 38:49 to 36:33 | 48.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:52 | 04:44 to 03:52 | 18.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:42 | 04:39 to 03:57 | 15.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 01:58 to 01:42 | 5.8% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 04:40 to 04:26 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:10 | 04:18 to 04:08 | 3.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:08 | 03:55 to 03:47 | 2.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Godsmark Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:10 | 00:00 | 04:11 +00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 05:10 | 04:16 +00:02 | 04:11 +00:59 |
| Running 2 | 04:49 | 09:28 | 04:27 +00:22 | 08:27 +01:01 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 14:17 | 02:34 -00:49 | 12:54 +01:23 |
| Running 3 | 04:42 | 16:02 | 04:49 -00:07 | 15:28 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 03:55 | 20:44 | 04:14 -00:19 | 20:17 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 04:45 | 24:39 | 04:47 -00:02 | 24:31 +00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:44 | 29:24 | 04:23 +00:21 | 29:18 +00:06 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 34:08 | 04:54 +00:05 | 33:41 +00:27 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 39:07 | 04:34 +00:06 | 38:35 +00:32 |
| Running 6 | 04:51 | 43:47 | 04:49 +00:02 | 43:09 +00:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 48:38 | 01:55 +00:03 | 47:58 +00:40 |
| Running 7 | 04:36 | 50:36 | 04:48 -00:12 | 49:53 +00:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:39 | 55:12 | 04:21 +00:18 | 54:41 +00:31 |
| Running 8 | 05:02 | 59:51 | 05:11 -00:09 | 59:02 +00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 04:14 | 01:04:53 | 05:25 -01:11 | 01:04:13 +00:40 |
| Roxzone | 06:09 | 01:15:08 | 05:30 +00:39 | 01:15:08 |
Daniel Godsmark delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne HYROX event, finishing in the top 10% of all participants and top 9% in his age group. His overall time of 01:15:08 highlights his strong capabilities across various exercises. However, his total running time of 00:38:49 was slightly slower than the average by 00:29, suggesting a slight need for improvement in running efficiency. Daniel's best running lap was impressive at 00:04:36, displaying potential in shorter running bursts. Interestingly, his performance in strength exercises, such as the sled push and wall balls, was significantly above average, indicating a stronger profile in strength-oriented tasks. His pacing appears consistent, though his initial running segments might be slightly slower, indicating a conservative start.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dunn Aaron | 2022 London | 01:14:46 | |
| Beestman Hanno | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:15:19 | |
| Boyle Evan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:15:17 | |
| Fernández De Pinto José Antonio | 2024 Madrid | 01:15:10 | |
| Quinn Conor | 2024 Maastricht | 01:15:19 | |
| Ferdjani Hitch | 2024 Marseille | 01:14:45 | |
| Simon Harley | 2024 Melbourne | 01:14:47 | |
| Turner Mike | 2023 Glasgow | 01:15:37 | |
| Rallis Andy | 2024 Singapore | 01:15:33 | |
| Stubbs Gregg | 2023 London | 01:15:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
