Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Barcelona using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Constant Amélie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Constant Amélie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Constant Amélie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Constant Amélie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 00:54. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 00:29 | 06:16 to 05:47 | 53.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:10 | 05:06 to 04:56 | 18.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 06:29 to 06:21 | 14.8% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 05:32 to 05:25 | 13.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:43 to 02:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:34 to 46:34 | 0.0% |
| Constant Amélie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:39 | 00:00 | 05:19 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 05:39 | 05:12 -00:13 | 05:19 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:34 | 10:38 | 05:47 -00:13 | 10:31 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 16:12 | 02:51 -00:08 | 16:18 -00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 18:55 | 06:05 -00:34 | 19:09 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 06:16 | 24:26 | 06:04 +00:12 | 25:14 -00:48 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 30:42 | 06:05 -00:26 | 31:18 -00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:29 | 36:21 | 06:39 -00:10 | 37:23 -01:02 |
| Running 5 | 05:52 | 42:50 | 06:15 -00:23 | 44:02 -01:12 |
| Rowing | 05:32 | 48:42 | 05:29 +00:03 | 50:17 -01:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 54:14 | 06:07 -00:04 | 55:46 -01:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:04 | 01:00:17 | 02:22 -00:18 | 01:01:53 -01:36 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 01:02:21 | 06:06 -00:08 | 01:04:15 -01:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:06 | 01:08:19 | 05:06 +00:00 | 01:10:21 -02:02 |
| Running 8 | 06:21 | 01:13:25 | 06:37 -00:16 | 01:15:27 -02:02 |
| Wall Balls | 05:00 | 01:19:46 | 05:25 -00:25 | 01:22:04 -02:18 |
| Roxzone | 10:20 | 01:34:57 | 07:28 +02:52 | 01:34:57 |
Amélie's best running lap was impressive, completing it in just 00:05:31. This indicates her strength and potential in running. However, there were areas where she lost time, specifically in the Roxzone, Running 1, and the Best Lap.
In conclusion, Amélie Constant demonstrated a strong performance in the HYROX race, placing her in the top percentiles of her age group. To further improve her performance, she should focus on minimizing time in the Roxzone, improving her running pace in the first segment, and optimizing her best lap time. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as HIIT, interval training, and agility drills, Amélie can enhance her overall performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cooke Stephanie | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:29 | |
| Seide Michaela | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:34:28 | |
| Jacomme Aurélie | 2023 Dublin | 01:34:34 | |
| Delafoy Marine | 2023 Paris | 01:35:03 | |
| Kehrens Julie | 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:48 | |
| Watkins Bj | 2019 New York | 01:34:44 | |
| De Groot Kim | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:27 | |
| Cowley Lucy | 2023 London | 01:34:37 | |
| Meneghello Serena | 2023 Rimini | 01:34:37 | |
| Duff Erin | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:35:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
