Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 961 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Eijkenboom Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Eijkenboom Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Eijkenboom Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Eijkenboom Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:36 | 52:41 to 50:05 | 38.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:48 | 10:15 to 08:27 | 26.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:41 | 08:10 to 06:29 | 25.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:15 | 02:55 to 02:40 | 3.7% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:26 to 05:13 | 3.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:55 to 04:46 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:23 to 03:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:16 to 05:16 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:16 to 06:16 | 0.0% |
| Eijkenboom Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:21 | 00:00 | 05:19 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:55 | 04:21 | 04:44 +00:11 | 05:19 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 06:26 | 09:16 | 05:48 +00:38 | 10:03 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 03:23 | 15:42 | 03:35 -00:12 | 15:51 -00:09 |
| Running 3 | 06:34 | 19:05 | 06:26 +00:08 | 19:26 -00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 05:16 | 25:39 | 06:19 -01:03 | 25:52 -00:13 |
| Running 4 | 06:44 | 30:55 | 06:26 +00:18 | 32:11 -01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:16 | 37:39 | 07:13 -00:57 | 38:37 -00:58 |
| Running 5 | 07:01 | 43:55 | 06:44 +00:17 | 45:50 -01:55 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 50:56 | 05:16 +00:10 | 52:34 -01:38 |
| Running 6 | 06:46 | 56:22 | 06:30 +00:16 | 57:50 -01:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:55 | 01:03:08 | 02:40 +00:15 | 01:04:20 -01:12 |
| Running 7 | 07:06 | 01:06:03 | 06:32 +00:34 | 01:07:00 -00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:10 | 01:13:09 | 06:43 +01:27 | 01:13:32 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 07:47 | 01:21:19 | 07:46 +00:01 | 01:20:15 +01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 10:15 | 01:29:06 | 08:51 +01:24 | 01:28:01 +01:05 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:46:17 | 09:25 -02:20 | 01:46:17 |
Nick Eijkenboom's performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race placed him in the top 62% of overall athletes and top 61% in his age group. His overall time of 01:46:17 suggests a competitive spirit, although there are areas for improvement. His total running time was 00:43 seconds slower than the average, indicating that while he shows potential in running, there is room to enhance his speed. Remarkably, he excelled in the Roxzone with a time significantly faster than average, showing strength in transitions. His pacing analysis reveals he started strong in the first running segment but gradually slowed down, indicating a need for better energy conservation across all running segments. Given these insights, Nick displays a hybrid profile with a slight edge in strength-based events but potential in running if pacing is optimized.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Keaney Barry | 2023 Glasgow | 01:46:47 | |
| Rashid Aminul | 2024 Taipei | 01:46:01 | |
| Lesme Pierre | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:46:46 | |
| Higuera Sainz Angel | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:46:23 | |
| Lucas Ian | 2024 London | 01:46:21 | |
| Morales Jiménez De Tejada Manuel | 2024 Madrid | 01:45:55 | |
| Stam Randell | 2024 Maastricht | 01:46:30 | |
| Schäffler Michael | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:46:41 | |
| Waugh James | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:45:50 | |
| Warburton John | 2022 London | 01:46:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:46:17 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:42:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
