Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 926 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sarano Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sarano Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sarano Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sarano Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ski Erg | 00:54 | 05:41 to 04:47 | 30.0% |
| Run Total | 00:33 | 50:59 to 50:26 | 18.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:32 | 04:12 to 03:40 | 17.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:32 | 06:47 to 06:15 | 17.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 06:51 to 06:33 | 10.0% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:26 to 05:15 | 6.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:19 to 06:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:36 to 02:36 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:31 to 08:31 | 0.0% |
| Sarano Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 05:20 -00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:41 | 04:27 | 04:45 +00:56 | 05:20 -00:53 |
| Running 2 | 05:54 | 10:08 | 05:55 -00:01 | 10:05 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 04:12 | 16:02 | 03:36 +00:36 | 16:00 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:25 | 20:14 | 06:30 -00:05 | 19:36 +00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 06:47 | 26:39 | 06:19 +00:28 | 26:06 +00:33 |
| Running 4 | 06:38 | 33:26 | 06:30 +00:08 | 32:25 +01:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:19 | 40:04 | 07:10 -00:51 | 38:55 +01:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:57 | 46:23 | 06:50 +00:07 | 46:05 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 53:20 | 05:16 +00:10 | 52:55 +00:25 |
| Running 6 | 06:45 | 58:46 | 06:35 +00:10 | 58:11 +00:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:36 | 01:05:31 | 02:41 -00:05 | 01:04:46 +00:45 |
| Running 7 | 06:40 | 01:08:07 | 06:34 +00:06 | 01:07:27 +00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:51 | 01:14:47 | 06:47 +00:04 | 01:14:01 +00:46 |
| Running 8 | 07:17 | 01:21:38 | 07:55 -00:38 | 01:20:48 +00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 08:31 | 01:28:55 | 08:53 -00:22 | 01:28:43 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 09:46 | 01:47:02 | 09:26 +00:20 | 01:47:02 |
Martin Sarano demonstrated an exceptional performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, ranking in the top 50% of his age group and overall participants. His total running time of 00:50:59, which is 01:16 faster than the average, indicates that he has a pronounced runner profile. His pacing strategy across the race was generally consistent, though he started the event with a faster than average pace in Running 1. This indicates effective endurance and stamina. However, there seems to be room for improvement in his strength-based exercises, which were generally slower than the average.
Martin should consider the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Verhallen Gijs | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:47:03 | |
| Platt Nathan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:47:28 | |
| Ford Steven | 2024 Anaheim | 01:46:48 | |
| Kappetein Theo | 2024 Maastricht | 01:46:32 | |
| Cella Walter | 2023 Milan | 01:46:44 | |
| Margreiter Philipp | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:47:28 | |
| Sullivan Chris | 2022 London | 01:47:27 | |
| Mabe Ethan | 2023 Dallas | 01:46:54 | |
| Kusen Brock | 2024 Melbourne | 01:46:32 | |
| Woodside Sam | 2024 Birmingham | 01:47:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2020 Chicago | 02:03:12 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
