Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 World Championships Nice using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
601 similar athletes.
Performance Highlights
IRL Men #154021 01:19:09
141st in
AG
| Top 17.0%
591st | Top 71.3%
-04:21
33:45
Run Total
-00:32
04:13
Avg. Lap
-00:13
03:51
Best Lap
+03:58
39:37
Workout Total
+00:30
04:57
Avg. Workout
+00:25
05:52
Roxzone
Race Summary
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Pro Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 601 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 601 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Mckeown Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mckeown Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 601 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mckeown Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Pro Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mckeown Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:11.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 601 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Pro Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Paul McKeown showcased a commendable effort in the 2024 World Championships in Nice, finishing in the top 39% of a competitive field of 1508 athletes and securing a position in the top 51% within his age group (30-34). A standout observation is Paul's exceptional total running time, which was 04:38 faster than average, highlighting his proficiency and endurance in running. This positions him more as a runner, suggesting strength exercises could further enhance his performance. However, Paul's pacing appeared to be aggressive in the initial running segments, which could have contributed to slower times in strength-focused exercises, indicating a need for a balanced approach to both running and strength training. The Roxzone time also suggests room for improvement in transition efficiency and overall fitness.
Segments to Improve:
Wall Balls: Paul's performance in Wall Balls was significantly slower than average, with a notable 02:07 slower than the average for his finish time. To improve, focus on high-intensity interval training (HIIT) incorporating wall balls to enhance power and endurance. Practicing squat depth and explosiveness can also improve efficiency. Additionally, incorporating exercises like thrusters and kettlebell swings could build the required strength and conditioning.
Burpees Broad Jump: Another area for improvement is the Burpees Broad Jump, where Paul was 01:14 slower than average. Improving plyometric power through exercises such as box jumps, standing long jumps, and plyometric push-ups can enhance performance. Emphasis on burpee efficiency, minimizing ground contact time, and maximizing jump distance should be a focus in training.
Sandbag Lunges: Paul was 01:17 slower than average in Sandbag Lunges. To address this, incorporating lunges with varying weights and distances into his routine could build both strength and endurance. Weighted step-ups and Bulgarian split squats can also improve leg strength and balance, crucial for efficient sandbag lunges.
Roxzone: Paul's transition times could be improved, as indicated by his Roxzone time being 00:38 slower than average. To enhance this, practicing quick transitions between different exercises in training sessions can improve efficiency. Also, focusing on overall fitness through circuit training could reduce fatigue, allowing for faster transitions.
Rowing: With a performance 00:17 slower than average in Rowing, implementing interval training on the rowing machine aimed at increasing stroke power and improving endurance is recommended. Technique adjustments, such as optimizing the catch and drive phases, could also lead to more efficient rowing.
Race Strategies:
Start Pacing: Paul should consider a more conservative start to preserve energy for strength exercises. By distributing his energy more evenly throughout the race, he could avoid significant drops in performance, especially in strength-focused segments.
Strength Training Emphasis: Given Paul's strong running capabilities, incorporating more strength training, particularly exercises that mimic race day conditions, could provide a significant boost to his overall performance.
Transition Efficiency: Focusing on reducing Roxzone times by practicing quick transitions between exercises during training sessions. This could also involve strategizing the layout of his equipment and practicing the order of exercises to minimize time wasted.
Technique Focus: For specific exercises where Paul has shown weaker performance, dedicating portions of his training to technique work can lead to significant improvements. This includes form correction in wall balls, efficiency in burpees, and power in rowing.
Recovery and Nutrition: Implementing a solid recovery and nutrition plan to support the increased training demands can help in sustaining performance improvements and avoiding injury.
By addressing these areas with targeted training and strategic race day approaches, Paul can leverage his running strength while significantly improving in weaker segments, potentially achieving a much higher overall rank in future races.
Race History
Explore your race history splits in detail below.
The interactive chart provides an easy way to analyze your performance by highlighting faster and slower times across each split.
This tool is designed to help you identify trends, track improvements, and refine your strategy for future races.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Pro Men