Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mccann Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mccann Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mccann Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mccann Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:09 | 06:49 to 05:40 | 40.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:06 | 05:45 to 04:39 | 38.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 02:52 to 02:33 | 11.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 02:15 to 01:57 | 10.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:23 to 38:23 | 0.0% |
| Mccann Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:19 | 00:00 | 04:30 +00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 05:19 | 04:23 -00:06 | 04:30 +00:49 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 09:36 | 04:48 -00:15 | 08:53 +00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 14:09 | 02:46 +00:06 | 13:41 +00:28 |
| Running 3 | 04:43 | 17:01 | 05:12 -00:29 | 16:27 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 04:18 | 21:44 | 04:41 -00:23 | 21:39 +00:05 |
| Running 4 | 04:41 | 26:02 | 05:09 -00:28 | 26:20 -00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:45 | 30:43 | 04:59 +00:46 | 31:29 -00:46 |
| Running 5 | 04:52 | 36:28 | 05:20 -00:28 | 36:28 +00:00 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 41:20 | 04:44 -00:06 | 41:48 -00:28 |
| Running 6 | 04:40 | 45:58 | 05:13 -00:33 | 46:32 -00:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:15 | 50:38 | 02:07 +00:08 | 51:45 -01:07 |
| Running 7 | 04:41 | 52:53 | 05:10 -00:29 | 53:52 -00:59 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:49 | 57:34 | 04:51 -01:02 | 59:02 -01:28 |
| Running 8 | 04:56 | 01:01:23 | 05:42 -00:46 | 01:03:53 -02:30 |
| Wall Balls | 06:49 | 01:06:19 | 06:10 +00:39 | 01:09:35 -03:16 |
| Roxzone | 09:03 | 01:22:05 | 06:20 +02:43 | 01:22:05 |
Mark Mccann demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. Ranking in the top 27% of 4107 athletes and the top 17% in his age group, he showcases his fitness and competitiveness. One notable aspect of Mark's performance is his exceptional running ability. His total running time is 2:54 faster than the average, suggesting a strong runner profile. However, his slower start in Running 1 indicates potential for improvement in pacing and endurance. Mark's performance in the strength-based segments was generally above average, except for a few areas that could be improved.
For future races, Mark should focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the running segments. Starting too slow in Running 1 could compromise his overall performance. Incorporating pace runs into his training could help with this. It's also important that he practices transitioning between segments to reduce time spent in the Roxzone. Lastly, given his exceptional running ability, Mark should ensure he's not compromising his strength training. Maintaining a balance between the two will be key to improving his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kerr Scott | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:21:36 | |
| Van Everdink Richard | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:15 | |
| Grant Stuart | 2024 Madrid | 01:22:31 | |
| Fox Jamie | 2024 Manchester | 01:22:20 | |
| Van Dijk Robert | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:53 | |
| Knott Ulrich | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:22:03 | |
| Bleimschein Benedict | 2018 Wien | 01:22:32 | |
| Huggins Sam | 2024 Malaga | 01:21:53 | |
| Kokotek Maciej | 2024 Poznan | 01:21:40 | |
| Jumahat Hafiz | 2023 Singapore | 01:22:09 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
