Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 295 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Manning Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Manning Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Manning Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Manning Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:03 | 58:36 to 55:33 | 55.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:12 | 11:16 to 10:04 | 21.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:42 | 08:57 to 08:15 | 12.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 07:30 to 07:10 | 6.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 05:06 to 04:59 | 2.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 04:18 to 04:13 | 1.5% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:21 to 05:21 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 07:32 to 07:32 | 0.0% |
| Manning Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:00 | 00:00 | 05:44 +01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:06 | 07:00 | 04:55 +00:11 | 05:44 +01:16 |
| Running 2 | 06:14 | 12:06 | 06:39 -00:25 | 10:39 +01:27 |
| Sled Push | 04:18 | 18:20 | 04:02 +00:16 | 17:18 +01:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:42 | 22:38 | 07:35 -00:53 | 21:20 +01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 07:30 | 29:20 | 07:20 +00:10 | 28:55 +00:25 |
| Running 4 | 07:25 | 36:50 | 07:26 -00:01 | 36:15 +00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:57 | 44:15 | 08:32 +00:25 | 43:41 +00:34 |
| Running 5 | 07:36 | 53:12 | 07:51 -00:15 | 52:13 +00:59 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 01:00:48 | 05:36 -00:15 | 01:00:04 +00:44 |
| Running 6 | 07:34 | 01:06:09 | 07:35 -00:01 | 01:05:40 +00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 01:13:43 | 02:55 -00:06 | 01:13:15 +00:28 |
| Running 7 | 07:13 | 01:16:32 | 07:47 -00:34 | 01:16:10 +00:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:32 | 01:23:45 | 08:01 -00:29 | 01:23:57 -00:12 |
| Running 8 | 08:56 | 01:31:17 | 09:53 -00:57 | 01:31:58 -00:41 |
| Wall Balls | 11:16 | 01:40:13 | 10:10 +01:06 | 01:41:51 -01:38 |
| Roxzone | 11:37 | 02:02:58 | 10:57 +00:40 | 02:02:58 |
Mark Manning demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, landing within the top 64% of all athletes and the top 65% within his age group. His Total Running Time of 00:58:36 was faster than average by 02:00, indicating a strong runner profile. However, his roxzone time was slower, suggesting he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time.
Specifically, his first two running segments showed a slower start than average, but Mark quickly picked up his pace, with his running times fast exceeding the average in the subsequent segments. This indicates that Mark could improve his performance by focusing on a stronger start to his race.
Despite Mark's strong overall performance, there are several areas he could improve to enhance his overall race time. The areas with the most room for improvement are:
Considering Mark's strong running profile and areas for improvement, the following strategies are recommended for his future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Esposito Antonio | 2024 Rimini | 02:02:34 | |
| Rizzo Luca | 2024 Milan | 02:03:13 | |
| Kamani Kamlesh | 2023 Melbourne | 02:02:40 | |
| Jones Rick | 2023 Glasgow | 02:02:44 | |
| Moran Sean | 2023 Birmingham | 02:03:24 | |
| HeuvelComma Van Den Marijn | 2024 Amsterdam | 02:02:50 | |
| Marshall Jason | 2024 New York | 02:03:15 | |
| Delis Dorian | 2024 Paris | 02:02:58 | |
| Neils Frank | 2024 Köln | 02:03:11 | |
| Toma Darryl | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 02:02:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
