Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Krätschmann Timm's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Krätschmann Timm's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Krätschmann Timm's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Krätschmann Timm's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:21 | 41:29 to 40:08 | 44.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:36 | 04:58 to 04:22 | 19.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:33 | 05:12 to 04:39 | 18.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:19 | 04:52 to 04:33 | 10.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 02:45 to 02:33 | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:34 to 05:34 | 0.0% |
| Krätschmann Timm | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:54 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 04:54 | 04:23 -00:11 | 04:29 +00:25 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 09:06 | 04:49 +00:05 | 08:52 +00:14 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 14:00 | 02:48 -00:03 | 13:41 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 16:45 | 05:13 -00:05 | 16:29 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 21:53 | 04:43 +00:15 | 21:42 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 26:51 | 05:11 -00:01 | 26:25 +00:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:12 | 32:01 | 05:00 +00:12 | 31:36 +00:25 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 37:13 | 05:21 +00:00 | 36:36 +00:37 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 42:34 | 04:44 -00:19 | 41:57 +00:37 |
| Running 6 | 05:16 | 46:59 | 05:14 +00:02 | 46:41 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 52:15 | 02:08 -00:14 | 51:55 +00:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 54:09 | 05:12 -00:02 | 54:03 +00:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:52 | 59:19 | 04:52 +00:00 | 59:15 +00:04 |
| Running 8 | 05:38 | 01:04:11 | 05:43 -00:05 | 01:04:07 +00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 05:34 | 01:09:49 | 06:12 -00:38 | 01:09:50 -00:01 |
| Roxzone | 07:09 | 01:22:24 | 06:22 +00:47 | 01:22:24 |
Timm Krätschmann displayed an impressive performance in the 2024 Hamburg Hyrox race, finishing in the top 50% of all athletes and the top 52% within his age group (35-39). His total race time was 01:22:24, and he demonstrated a strong ability in both running and strength-based exercises. Despite this, there are notable areas for improvement to enhance his future performance.
His total running time was 00:41:29, just 00:07 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates a good balance between endurance and strength, though there is room to boost his running speed. His pacing at the beginning of the race was slightly slower than average, but he managed to maintain a steady pace throughout the race, which is commendable.
Implementing the following strategies could lead to a better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Almeida Toledo Bruno | 2022 London | 01:22:45 | |
| Fryland Morten | 2023 Hamburg | 01:22:49 | |
| Lux Tobias | 2021 Hamburg | 01:22:31 | |
| Pérez Pérez Christian Adan | 2024 Madrid | 01:22:20 | |
| Lamcja Juri | 2023 Valencia | 01:22:13 | |
| Hinz Thomas | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:22:24 | |
| Heller Marcus | 2023 München | 01:22:48 | |
| Lanooij Bart | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:22:36 | |
| Taylor Ash | 2024 London | 01:22:53 | |
| Jonczyk Sebastian | 2022 Essen | 01:22:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:34:22 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:34:22 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:13 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
