Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Cape Town using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Janet Gilad's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Janet Gilad's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Janet Gilad's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Janet Gilad's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:51 | 08:33 to 05:42 | 59.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:09 | 03:06 to 01:57 | 24.0% |
| Run Total | 00:43 | 41:01 to 40:18 | 14.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 04:39 to 04:35 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:01 | 04:25 to 04:24 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Janet Gilad | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:38 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 04:38 | 04:24 -00:13 | 04:29 +00:09 |
| Running 2 | 04:36 | 08:49 | 04:51 -00:15 | 08:53 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 01:59 | 13:25 | 02:49 -00:50 | 13:44 -00:19 |
| Running 3 | 04:49 | 15:24 | 05:14 -00:25 | 16:33 -01:09 |
| Sled Pull | 04:25 | 20:13 | 04:45 -00:20 | 21:47 -01:34 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 24:38 | 05:12 -00:13 | 26:32 -01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:10 | 29:37 | 05:02 -00:52 | 31:44 -02:07 |
| Running 5 | 05:14 | 33:47 | 05:22 -00:08 | 36:46 -02:59 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 39:01 | 04:45 -00:06 | 42:08 -03:07 |
| Running 6 | 04:47 | 43:40 | 05:14 -00:27 | 46:53 -03:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:06 | 48:27 | 02:07 +00:59 | 52:07 -03:40 |
| Running 7 | 06:39 | 51:33 | 05:13 +01:26 | 54:14 -02:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:39 | 58:12 | 04:52 -00:13 | 59:27 -01:15 |
| Running 8 | 05:23 | 01:02:51 | 05:43 -00:20 | 01:04:19 -01:28 |
| Wall Balls | 08:33 | 01:08:14 | 06:14 +02:19 | 01:10:02 -01:48 |
| Roxzone | 06:00 | 01:22:38 | 06:22 -00:22 | 01:22:38 |
Gilad Janet delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Cape Town Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 87 out of 394 athletes. He ranked 9th in his age group, placing him in the top 18% of the 16-24 category. His total running time of 00:41:01 was notably 00:38 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Although he started slightly slow in Running 1, his subsequent running segments showed consistent improvement, suggesting a well-managed pace throughout the race. Overall, Gilad demonstrated a balanced skill set with a slight edge in running over strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lewis Ash | 2023 Glasgow | 01:22:12 | |
| Häußler Simon | 2023 Hannover | 01:22:51 | |
| Van Der Harst Jeffrey | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:22:23 | |
| Bugryn Sasha | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:41 | |
| Koch Quirin | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:22:38 | |
| Reynolds Tadhg | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:55 | |
| Paddon Lawrence | 2023 Manchester | 01:23:06 | |
| Chew Jing Yan | 2023 Singapore | 01:22:12 | |
| Pezoa Berrios Juan Pablo | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:22:34 | |
| Mcnamara Gary | 2023 Dublin | 01:22:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
