Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dijkstra Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dijkstra Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dijkstra Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dijkstra Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:14 | 07:37 to 06:23 | 51.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:57 | 08:38 to 07:41 | 39.9% |
| Run Total | 00:12 | 47:41 to 47:29 | 8.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:48 to 02:48 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:11 to 05:11 | 0.0% |
| Dijkstra Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:13 | 00:00 | 05:03 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 04:13 | 04:39 -00:10 | 05:03 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 08:42 | 05:33 +00:03 | 09:42 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 02:48 | 14:18 | 03:23 -00:35 | 15:15 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 06:02 | 17:06 | 06:05 -00:03 | 18:38 -01:32 |
| Sled Pull | 05:28 | 23:08 | 05:48 -00:20 | 24:43 -01:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:56 | 28:36 | 06:04 -00:08 | 30:31 -01:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:37 | 34:32 | 06:35 +01:02 | 36:35 -02:03 |
| Running 5 | 05:59 | 42:09 | 06:20 -00:21 | 43:10 -01:01 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 48:08 | 05:06 -00:19 | 49:30 -01:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 52:55 | 06:08 -00:01 | 54:36 -01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 59:02 | 02:31 -00:10 | 01:00:44 -01:42 |
| Running 7 | 06:31 | 01:01:23 | 06:07 +00:24 | 01:03:15 -01:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:07:54 | 06:12 -01:01 | 01:09:22 -01:28 |
| Running 8 | 07:20 | 01:13:05 | 07:08 +00:12 | 01:15:34 -02:29 |
| Wall Balls | 08:38 | 01:20:25 | 07:52 +00:46 | 01:22:42 -02:17 |
| Roxzone | 10:10 | 01:39:05 | 08:31 +01:39 | 01:39:05 |
Nick Dijkstra delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 56% overall and the top 62% within his age group. His total running time was 01:07 faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. However, his performance showed a tendency to start fast, as seen in the initial running segments where he ranked in the 22nd and 30th percentiles, suggesting he might have expended excessive energy early in the race. His profile leans more toward a runner, as indicated by his above-average running time, suggesting a need to enhance his strength training to balance his overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chow Man Him | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:38:58 | |
| Rondorf Patrick | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:39:13 | |
| Dupuis Pasqualini JeanBaptiste | 2024 Marseille | 01:38:45 | |
| Hibner Kamil | 2024 Gdansk | 01:39:12 | |
| Van De Willige Roy | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:39:22 | |
| Brady Emmet | 2024 Birmingham | 01:39:20 | |
| Dawson Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:39:08 | |
| Durgeloh Michael | 2024 Hamburg | 01:38:50 | |
| Kormann Andreas | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:39:04 | |
| Jorjiev Popov Stoyanova Youlian | 2023 Madrid | 01:39:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
