Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Clancey Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Clancey Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Clancey Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Clancey Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:42 | 07:19 to 05:37 | 45.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 05:53 to 05:06 | 20.8% |
| Run Total | 00:46 | 45:03 to 44:17 | 20.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 05:36 to 05:19 | 7.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:09 | 06:54 to 06:45 | 4.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:18 to 02:13 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:17 to 02:17 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Clancey Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:58 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:01 | 04:58 | 04:32 -00:31 | 04:46 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 08:59 | 05:13 -00:04 | 09:18 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 02:17 | 14:08 | 03:07 -00:50 | 14:31 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 16:25 | 05:43 -00:20 | 17:38 -01:13 |
| Sled Pull | 05:53 | 21:48 | 05:19 +00:34 | 23:21 -01:33 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 27:41 | 05:41 -00:12 | 28:40 -00:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:19 | 33:10 | 05:52 +01:27 | 34:21 -01:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:46 | 40:29 | 05:53 -00:07 | 40:13 +00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 46:15 | 04:56 -00:15 | 46:06 +00:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 50:56 | 05:43 +00:01 | 51:02 -00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 56:40 | 02:19 -00:01 | 56:45 -00:05 |
| Running 7 | 05:46 | 58:58 | 05:41 +00:05 | 59:04 -00:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 01:04:44 | 05:32 +00:04 | 01:04:45 -00:01 |
| Running 8 | 06:50 | 01:10:20 | 06:27 +00:23 | 01:10:17 +00:03 |
| Wall Balls | 06:54 | 01:17:10 | 07:09 -00:15 | 01:16:44 +00:26 |
| Roxzone | 07:31 | 01:31:29 | 07:36 -00:05 | 01:31:29 |
Tom Clancey delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Melbourne HYROX event, ranking in the top 40% overall and top 41% within his age group. His overall time of 01:31:29 is commendable, with a notably faster total running time compared to the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his pacing suggests that he might have started a bit too fast, as evidenced by the slower times in the later running segments. Tom's strength in exercises like Ski Erg and Sled Push highlights his potential in these areas, while room for improvement remains in segments like Burpees Broad Jump and Sled Pull.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Christensen Michael | 2023 Malmö | 01:31:39 | |
| Chavaroc William | 2024 Paris | 01:31:15 | |
| Yeung Stephen | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:31:57 | |
| Gambert Jimmy | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:31:04 | |
| Rice Tom | 2022 London | 01:31:46 | |
| Murphy Cian | 2024 Malaga | 01:31:11 | |
| Fernandes André | 2024 Madrid | 01:30:59 | |
| Fumat Guillaume | 2024 Malaga | 01:31:14 | |
| Reichmann Alexander | 2019 Essen | 01:31:27 | |
| Szymczak Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
