Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 467 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Barrow Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Barrow Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Barrow Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Barrow Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:31 | 09:42 to 07:11 | 32.8% |
| Sled Pull | 02:02 | 08:51 to 06:49 | 26.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:26 | 04:22 to 02:56 | 18.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:20 | 09:09 to 07:49 | 17.4% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:47 to 05:25 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:30 to 03:30 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:48 to 07:48 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 51:57 to 51:57 | 0.0% |
| Barrow Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:29 | 00:00 | 05:36 +00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 06:29 | 04:53 -00:04 | 05:36 +00:53 |
| Running 2 | 05:44 | 11:18 | 06:15 -00:31 | 10:29 +00:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:30 | 17:02 | 04:04 -00:34 | 16:44 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 20:32 | 06:57 -00:56 | 20:48 -00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 08:51 | 26:33 | 06:56 +01:55 | 27:45 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:07 | 35:24 | 06:59 -00:52 | 34:41 +00:43 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 09:09 | 41:31 | 08:09 +01:00 | 41:40 -00:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 50:40 | 07:22 -00:51 | 49:49 +00:51 |
| Rowing | 05:47 | 57:11 | 05:28 +00:19 | 57:11 +00:00 |
| Running 6 | 06:24 | 01:02:58 | 07:08 -00:44 | 01:02:39 +00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 04:22 | 01:09:22 | 02:51 +01:31 | 01:09:47 -00:25 |
| Running 7 | 06:28 | 01:13:44 | 07:04 -00:36 | 01:12:38 +01:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 09:42 | 01:20:12 | 07:29 +02:13 | 01:19:42 +00:30 |
| Running 8 | 08:15 | 01:29:54 | 08:59 -00:44 | 01:27:11 +02:43 |
| Wall Balls | 07:48 | 01:38:09 | 09:42 -01:54 | 01:36:10 +01:59 |
| Roxzone | 10:37 | 01:56:28 | 10:36 +00:01 | 01:56:28 |
Paul Barrow, competing in the 40-44 age category, demonstrated a commendable performance, placing in the top 62% of all athletes and in the top 64% within his age group. Particularly noteworthy is Paul's running performance. His total running time was faster than the average by 04:47, exhibiting a distinctly runner profile. This highlights his exceptional endurance and pacing ability. However, to improve his overall ranking, it is crucial to address the areas of weakness that emerged during this race, particularly concerning strength exercises.
Going forward, Paul should aim to maintain a steady pace throughout the race, avoiding starting too fast or slowing down excessively towards the end. In regards to strength segments, it's crucial that Paul employs proper form and technique to prevent injury and improve efficiency. Experimenting with different breathing techniques can also help manage fatigue during strength exercises. Lastly, focusing on efficient transitions between segments can significantly reduce the overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Williams Neil | 2023 London | 01:56:26 | |
| Shikoff Joshua | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:56:00 | |
| Tan Jovi | 2023 Singapore | 01:56:23 | |
| Hilbers Joris | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:56:21 | |
| Walker Jonathan | 2023 Malmö | 01:56:04 | |
| Calpin Ramlawi Adnan | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:56:25 | |
| Van Kralingen Cian | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:56:18 | |
| Moorthy Ashvath | 2023 Stockholm | 01:56:38 | |
| Motier Quentin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:56:38 | |
| Le Tissier Matt | 2023 London | 01:56:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 02:03:02 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 02:03:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
