Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 615 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Armstrong Alex's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Armstrong Alex's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Armstrong Alex's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Armstrong Alex's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:29 | 01:02:32 to 53:03 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:09 to 03:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:03 to 07:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:34 to 06:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:49 to 06:49 | 0.0% |
| Armstrong Alex | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:20 | 00:00 | 05:29 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:50 | 06:20 | 04:51 -00:01 | 05:29 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 06:31 | 11:10 | 06:07 +00:24 | 10:20 +00:50 |
| Sled Push | 03:09 | 17:41 | 03:57 -00:48 | 16:27 +01:14 |
| Running 3 | 08:54 | 20:50 | 06:51 +02:03 | 20:24 +00:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:55 | 29:44 | 06:51 -01:56 | 27:15 +02:29 |
| Running 4 | 07:55 | 34:39 | 06:52 +01:03 | 34:06 +00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:03 | 42:34 | 07:46 -00:43 | 40:58 +01:36 |
| Running 5 | 08:55 | 49:37 | 07:13 +01:42 | 48:44 +00:53 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 58:32 | 05:25 -00:08 | 55:57 +02:35 |
| Running 6 | 07:46 | 01:03:49 | 06:56 +00:50 | 01:01:22 +02:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 01:11:35 | 02:47 -00:19 | 01:08:18 +03:17 |
| Running 7 | 07:22 | 01:14:03 | 06:56 +00:26 | 01:11:05 +02:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:34 | 01:21:25 | 07:16 -00:42 | 01:18:01 +03:24 |
| Running 8 | 08:52 | 01:27:59 | 08:35 +00:17 | 01:25:17 +02:42 |
| Wall Balls | 06:49 | 01:36:51 | 09:42 -02:53 | 01:33:52 +02:59 |
| Roxzone | 10:08 | 01:53:42 | 10:08 +00:00 | 01:53:42 |
When analyzing the splits, it is evident that Alex struggled in the running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 3, Running 5, Best Lap, Running 4, Running 6, Running 7, Running 2, and Running 8. These segments accounted for the majority of his time lost compared to the average. It is crucial for Alex to focus on improving his running performance to enhance his overall race performance.
In conclusion, while Alex Armstrong's performance in the 2022 London HYROX race was commendable, there are areas that can be improved to enhance his overall race performance. By focusing on improving his running performance, implementing interval and strength training, and optimizing his pacing strategy, Alex can strive for even better results in future races. Additionally, prioritizing mental preparation can contribute to a stronger competitive mindset. Good luck in your future races, Alex!
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lo Robin | 2024 Taipei | 01:53:42 | |
| Abington Timothy | 2023 London | 01:53:44 | |
| Velkos Georgios | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:53:50 | |
| Crisci Marco | 2024 Milan | 01:53:40 | |
| Ballantyne Andrew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:54:00 | |
| Andrade Luna Francisco | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:53:51 | |
| Nayi Prits | 2024 Birmingham | 01:54:01 | |
| Noma Owen | 2024 Birmingham | 01:53:57 | |
| Targioni Lapo | 2024 Milan | 01:53:56 | |
| Tatil Ugalino Ferico | 2022 Madrid | 01:53:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:43:07 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:52:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
