Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tsimbler Greg's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tsimbler Greg's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tsimbler Greg's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tsimbler Greg's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:32 | 40:19 to 36:47 | 81.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:08 to 01:43 | 9.6% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:36 to 04:27 | 3.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 04:07 to 03:59 | 3.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 03:57 to 03:50 | 2.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:50 to 01:50 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Tsimbler Greg | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 04:13 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 04:24 | 04:17 -00:09 | 04:13 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 08:32 | 04:30 +00:07 | 08:30 +00:02 |
| Sled Push | 01:50 | 13:09 | 02:35 -00:45 | 13:00 +00:09 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 14:59 | 04:52 +00:18 | 15:35 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 20:09 | 04:16 -00:19 | 20:27 -00:18 |
| Running 4 | 05:12 | 24:06 | 04:49 +00:23 | 24:43 -00:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:44 | 29:18 | 04:25 -00:41 | 29:32 -00:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 33:02 | 04:57 +00:12 | 33:57 -00:55 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 38:11 | 04:34 +00:02 | 38:54 -00:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 42:47 | 04:51 +00:17 | 43:28 -00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 47:55 | 01:56 +00:12 | 48:19 -00:24 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 50:03 | 04:50 +00:16 | 50:15 -00:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:07 | 55:09 | 04:23 -00:16 | 55:05 +00:04 |
| Running 8 | 05:37 | 59:16 | 05:12 +00:25 | 59:28 -00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 04:13 | 01:04:53 | 05:29 -01:16 | 01:04:40 +00:13 |
| Roxzone | 06:44 | 01:15:43 | 05:34 +01:10 | 01:15:43 |
Based on the splits analysis, Greg's best running lap was 00:04:24, and he was generally slower than average in the running segments, with Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 6, Running 7, Running 8, and Running 5 being the segments where he lost the most time. His total running time was slower than average, indicating that he may need to improve his running abilities.
In summary, Greg Tsimbler performed well in the 2021 London Hyrox race, but there are areas for improvement. He should focus on improving his running performance through specific drills and exercises, while also maintaining his strength training routine. By implementing effective race strategies, pacing himself appropriately, and minimizing transition time, Greg can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Graignic Maxime | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:16:05 | |
| Weir Cameron | 2024 Brisbane | 01:15:39 | |
| Van Manen John | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:15:14 | |
| Pickles James | 2023 Glasgow | 01:15:27 | |
| Hoather Steve | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:16:00 | |
| Drennan Johnny | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:15:28 | |
| Smith Thomas | 2024 Sydney | 01:15:51 | |
| Eling Kai | 2022 Hamburg | 01:15:33 | |
| Webb Scott | 2023 Dallas | 01:16:12 | |
| Bankiewicz Thomas | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:15:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
