Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 235 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gohla Jeanpierre's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gohla Jeanpierre's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gohla Jeanpierre's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gohla Jeanpierre's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:29 | 47:51 to 44:22 | 50.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:31 | 07:55 to 05:24 | 36.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 | 07:02 to 06:04 | 13.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:43 to 05:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:49 to 01:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:54 to 07:54 | 0.0% |
| Gohla Jeanpierre | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:59 | 00:00 | 04:28 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:59 | 04:23 -00:10 | 04:28 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 06:02 | 08:12 | 05:06 +00:56 | 08:51 -00:39 |
| Sled Push | 04:17 | 14:14 | 04:37 -00:20 | 13:57 +00:17 |
| Running 3 | 06:05 | 18:31 | 05:40 +00:25 | 18:34 -00:03 |
| Sled Pull | 05:43 | 24:36 | 08:12 -02:29 | 24:14 +00:22 |
| Running 4 | 06:13 | 30:19 | 05:45 +00:28 | 32:26 -02:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:55 | 36:32 | 05:33 +02:22 | 38:11 -01:39 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 44:27 | 05:53 +00:24 | 43:44 +00:43 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 50:44 | 04:52 -00:08 | 49:37 +01:07 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 55:28 | 05:44 +00:23 | 54:29 +00:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:49 | 01:01:35 | 02:47 -00:58 | 01:00:13 +01:22 |
| Running 7 | 06:19 | 01:03:24 | 05:47 +00:32 | 01:03:00 +00:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:02 | 01:09:43 | 06:24 +00:38 | 01:08:47 +00:56 |
| Running 8 | 06:52 | 01:16:45 | 06:41 +00:11 | 01:15:11 +01:34 |
| Wall Balls | 07:54 | 01:23:37 | 08:41 -00:47 | 01:21:52 +01:45 |
| Roxzone | 07:02 | 01:38:23 | 07:50 -00:48 | 01:38:23 |
JeanPierre Gohla demonstrated a commendable effort in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX PRO event. He finished in the top 71% overall and top 70% within his age group, which indicates a consistent performance across various segments. His total running time was slightly slower than average, suggesting an area for improvement in running efficiency. The strong performance in strength-based segments like the Sled Pull and Farmers Carry indicates a robust strength profile. However, the overall pacing analysis shows that he started the race at a competitive pace but gradually lost time in subsequent running segments, indicating a potential need to focus on endurance and pacing strategies. Overall, JeanPierre exhibits a hybrid profile with notable strength capabilities but requires more focus on running endurance and pacing.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Naylor Dan | 2022 Birmingham | 01:38:17 | |
| Genutis Mindaugas | 2022 Dallas | 01:38:51 | |
| Carr Tim | 2023 Dallas | 01:38:53 | |
| Haffner Florian | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:38:10 | |
| Mccole Edward | 2023 Hamburg | 01:38:08 | |
| Hardwicke George | 2023 London | 01:38:30 | |
| Askviken Filip | 2024 Stockholm | 01:38:04 | |
| Fieger Tim | 2023 München | 01:38:48 | |
| Petke Tino | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:38:13 | |
| Adelfinger Karl | WorldChampionship - Leipzig | 01:37:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Köln | 01:37:04 | |
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:31:46 | |
| 2023 Frankfurt | 01:28:44 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:27:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
