Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:48. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:54 (From 07:24 to 05:30) | 32.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 01:28 (From 03:22 to 01:54) | 25.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:11 (From 05:37 to 04:26) | 20.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 (From 04:57 to 04:16) | 11.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:22 (From 04:38 to 04:16) | 6.3% |
| Rowing | 00:11 (From 04:47 to 04:36) | 3.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 (From 02:29 to 02:28) | 0.3% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 03:58 to 03:58) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 37:09 to 37:09) | 0.0% |
| Escandell García Miguel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:09 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 04:09 | 04:21 +00:17 | 04:23 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:38 | 08:47 | 04:44 -00:06 | 08:44 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 13:25 | 02:44 -00:15 | 13:28 -00:03 |
| Running 3 | 04:48 | 15:54 | 05:08 -00:20 | 16:12 -00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 04:57 | 20:42 | 04:37 +00:20 | 21:20 -00:38 |
| Running 4 | 04:34 | 25:39 | 05:06 -00:32 | 25:57 -00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:58 | 30:13 | 04:55 -00:57 | 31:03 -00:50 |
| Running 5 | 04:42 | 34:11 | 05:15 -00:33 | 35:58 -01:47 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 38:53 | 04:42 +00:05 | 41:13 -02:20 |
| Running 6 | 04:36 | 43:40 | 05:08 -00:32 | 45:55 -02:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:22 | 48:16 | 02:04 +01:18 | 51:03 -02:47 |
| Running 7 | 04:27 | 51:38 | 05:07 -00:40 | 53:07 -01:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:37 | 56:05 | 04:46 +00:51 | 58:14 -02:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:01:42 | 05:36 -00:18 | 01:03:00 -01:18 |
| Wall Balls | 07:24 | 01:07:00 | 05:59 +01:25 | 01:08:36 -01:36 |
| Roxzone | 06:34 | 01:20:50 | 06:15 +00:19 | 01:20:50 |
Miguel showed strength in his running performance, with a total running time that was faster than average. This indicates that he has a good running profile and should continue to train and focus on his running abilities. His best running lap was 00:04:09, which was 00:07 faster than average.
- Miguel should also consider strategizing his approach to the segments that he struggled with the most. For the Wall Balls, he should focus on pacing himself and not exerting too much energy at the beginning. For the Farmers Carry and Sandbag Lunges, he should focus on maintaining good form and finding a rhythm that allows him to effectively complete the exercises while conserving energy.
- In the Roxzone, Miguel should aim to improve his overall fitness and transition time. Implementing specific HIIT workouts that simulate the transitions between exercise zones can help him improve his speed and efficiency in this segment.
- Miguel should also practice proper technique and form for each exercise to maximize efficiency and minimize time spent on each segment. This can be achieved through consistent training and seeking guidance from a coach or experienced trainer.
In conclusion, Miguel Escandell García performed well in the 2021 Madrid Hyrox race, with strengths in his running performance. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on specific segments such as Wall Balls, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, Roxzone, and Ski Erg. By incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and form corrections, he can enhance his performance in these areas. Implementing race strategies such as maintaining a consistent pace and strategizing his approach to challenging segments will also contribute to his overall improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Van Apeldoorn Carlo | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:20 | |
| Miller Jonathan | 2024 Dublin | 01:21:02 | |
| Kirschbaum Kai | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:21:16 | |
| Chambeglain Raymond | 2024 Singapore | 01:20:52 | |
| Andersen Per | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:46 | |
| O'Mahony Gavin | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:49 | |
| Felvus Terry | 2023 London | 01:21:00 | |
| Basso Andrea | 2024 Rimini | 01:20:37 | |
| Attard Jonathan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:28 | |
| Van Der Pluym Harmen | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:21:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Valencia Escandell García Miguel | 01:10:14 | |
| 2023 Madrid Escandell García Miguel | 01:18:41 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Escandell García Miguel
