Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:31 (From 06:44 to 05:13) | 44.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:54 (From 05:58 to 05:04) | 26.5% |
| BBJ | 00:40 (From 07:13 to 06:33) | 19.6% |
| Rowing | 00:10 (From 05:38 to 05:28) | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 (From 02:26 to 02:17) | 4.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 05:03 to 05:03) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:37 to 02:37) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 05:52 to 05:52) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 47:57 to 47:57) | 0.0% |
| Whitehouse Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:59 | 00:00 | 05:26 -01:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 03:59 | 05:15 -00:12 | 05:26 -01:27 |
| Running 2 | 05:59 | 09:02 | 05:46 +00:13 | 10:41 -01:39 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 15:01 | 02:57 -00:20 | 16:27 -01:26 |
| Running 3 | 06:12 | 17:38 | 06:05 +00:07 | 19:24 -01:46 |
| Sled Pull | 05:52 | 23:50 | 06:17 -00:25 | 25:29 -01:39 |
| Running 4 | 06:09 | 29:42 | 06:07 +00:02 | 31:46 -02:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:13 | 35:51 | 06:54 +00:19 | 37:53 -02:02 |
| Running 5 | 06:07 | 43:04 | 06:18 -00:11 | 44:47 -01:43 |
| Rowing | 05:38 | 49:11 | 05:32 +00:06 | 51:05 -01:54 |
| Running 6 | 06:13 | 54:49 | 06:09 +00:04 | 56:37 -01:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:26 | 01:01:02 | 02:25 +00:01 | 01:02:46 -01:44 |
| Running 7 | 06:17 | 01:03:28 | 06:08 +00:09 | 01:05:11 -01:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:58 | 01:09:45 | 05:15 +00:43 | 01:11:19 -01:34 |
| Running 8 | 07:02 | 01:15:43 | 06:43 +00:19 | 01:16:34 -00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 06:44 | 01:22:45 | 05:35 +01:09 | 01:23:17 -00:32 |
| Roxzone | 07:10 | 01:36:33 | 07:41 -00:31 | 01:36:33 |
Sarah Whitehouse, competing in the HYROX event in Manchester, demonstrated a commendable performance overall. She ranked in the top 12% of all athletes and the top 13% of her age group (40-44), underlining her competitive edge and fitness level. Sarah's overall time was 01:36:33, with a total running time of 00:47:57, which was 01:13 faster than the average, indicating her strong running abilities.
Her performance in the initial segments of the race was particularly impressive. She started off with a strong pace in her first run, achieving a time that was 01:25 faster than average. This could suggest that she has a high level of aerobic fitness, allowing her to maintain a fast pace during the initial stages of the race. However, there were fluctuations in her pace in the later stages of the race, which suggests that endurance may be an area for improvement.
Based on her faster total running time and slower times in strength-based segments, it appears that Sarah has a runner profile. This indicates that her running abilities are currently stronger than her strength abilities, and training should be adjusted accordingly.
Given Sarah's strong start in the race, she might consider working on maintaining a consistent pace throughout, to avoid potential burnout in later stages. This could be achieved through regular practice runs focusing on pace management.
As Sarah's strength segments need improvement, she could strategize to conserve energy during the running segments, ensuring she has enough strength and endurance for the strength-based segments. This may involve adjusting her running pace or incorporating short, strategic recovery periods during the race.
Finally, focusing on optimizing transitions between different segments could shave off valuable seconds from her total time. This could involve planning out each transition in advance and practicing these transitions during training.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Shields Jami | 2022 Dallas | 01:36:03 | |
| Evans Hannah | 2024 London | 01:36:34 | |
| Richards Kori | 2024 Melbourne | 01:36:46 | |
| Teklenburg Lauren | 2024 Brisbane | 01:36:54 | |
| Caines Jill | 2024 Toronto | 01:36:58 | |
| Taylor Joey | 2024 Manchester | 01:36:15 | |
| Edmondson Cassie | 2024 Perth | 01:36:12 | |
| Peña Rios Tania Libertad | 2024 Mexico City | 01:36:50 | |
| Schoska Lea | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:36:27 | |
| Mallaney Kirstie | 2023 Hamburg | 01:36:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Milan Whitehouse Sarah | 01:42:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Whitehouse Sarah
