Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Thiel Jannik's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Thiel Jannik's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Thiel Jannik's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Thiel Jannik's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:12 | 43:41 to 41:29 | 51.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:58 | 05:34 to 04:36 | 22.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:35 | 06:36 to 06:01 | 13.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:18 to 02:02 | 6.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:13 | 02:54 to 02:41 | 5.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 04:53 to 04:48 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Thiel Jannik | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:12 | 00:00 | 04:35 -00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 04:12 | 04:26 -00:15 | 04:35 -00:23 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 08:23 | 04:55 +00:03 | 09:01 -00:38 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 13:21 | 02:51 +00:03 | 13:56 -00:35 |
| Running 3 | 06:09 | 16:15 | 05:22 +00:47 | 16:47 -00:32 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 22:24 | 04:53 +00:41 | 22:09 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 27:58 | 05:20 +00:32 | 27:02 +00:56 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:59 | 33:50 | 05:17 -01:18 | 32:22 +01:28 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 37:49 | 05:31 -00:03 | 37:39 +00:10 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 43:17 | 04:48 -00:10 | 43:10 +00:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 47:55 | 05:22 +00:00 | 47:58 -00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 53:17 | 02:10 +00:08 | 53:20 -00:03 |
| Running 7 | 05:12 | 55:35 | 05:21 -00:09 | 55:30 +00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:00:47 | 05:03 -00:10 | 01:00:51 -00:04 |
| Running 8 | 06:31 | 01:05:40 | 05:57 +00:34 | 01:05:54 -00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 06:36 | 01:12:11 | 06:27 +00:09 | 01:11:51 +00:20 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:25:03 | 06:45 -00:21 | 01:25:03 |
Pacing Analysis:
Jannik demonstrated good pacing throughout the race, with consistent splits in most segments. However, there were a few segments where he lost significant time, indicating a need for improvement in those areas. It is important for him to maintain a steady pace throughout the race to optimize his overall performance.
Profile Analysis:
Based on the results, Jannik has a balanced profile with strengths in both running and strength exercises. His running splits were generally on par with or slightly faster than the average, indicating good endurance and speed. However, his strength exercises were consistently slower than the average, suggesting a need for improvement in this aspect.
In summary, Jannik Thiel performed well in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By targeting specific areas of improvement, implementing tailored training strategies, and focusing on pacing and mental preparation, Jannik can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mcinroy Owen | 2022 Manchester | 01:25:23 | |
| Seibel Richard | 2019 Essen | 01:25:03 | |
| Yap Feng Kai | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:24:39 | |
| Gambert Alexis | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:25:16 | |
| Doiron Dallas | 2024 Dallas | 01:24:54 | |
| Scherer Simon | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:25:24 | |
| Cochran James | 2022 Dallas | 01:25:24 | |
| Hildebrandt Dirk | 2021 Hamburg | 01:25:24 | |
| Thiel Jannik | 2023 München | 01:25:03 | |
| Jezela Marcin | 2024 Gdansk | 01:24:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Stuttgart | 01:24:44 | |
| 2023 Köln | 01:22:01 | |
| 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:20:38 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:27:40 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | 01:31:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
