Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Scraton Jessie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Scraton Jessie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Scraton Jessie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Scraton Jessie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:03 | 44:39 to 41:36 | 65.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 05:31 to 04:44 | 16.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 02:37 to 02:15 | 7.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:20 | 02:16 to 01:56 | 7.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:56 to 04:50 | 2.1% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:06 to 05:04 | 0.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:25 to 03:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Scraton Jessie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:04 | 00:00 | 04:49 +00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 05:04 | 04:58 -00:02 | 04:49 +00:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:24 | 10:00 | 05:08 +00:16 | 09:47 +00:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:37 | 15:24 | 02:32 +00:05 | 14:55 +00:29 |
| Running 3 | 05:59 | 18:01 | 05:24 +00:35 | 17:27 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 05:31 | 24:00 | 05:13 +00:18 | 22:51 +01:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:47 | 29:31 | 05:25 +00:22 | 28:04 +01:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:37 | 35:18 | 05:21 -00:44 | 33:29 +01:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:40 | 39:55 | 05:32 +00:08 | 38:50 +01:05 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 45:35 | 05:12 -00:06 | 44:22 +01:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 50:41 | 05:27 +00:07 | 49:34 +01:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 56:15 | 02:06 +00:10 | 55:01 +01:14 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 58:31 | 05:25 +00:12 | 57:07 +01:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:25 | 01:04:08 | 04:19 -00:54 | 01:02:32 +01:36 |
| Running 8 | 05:38 | 01:07:33 | 05:44 -00:06 | 01:06:51 +00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 03:46 | 01:13:11 | 04:20 -00:34 | 01:12:35 +00:36 |
| Roxzone | 06:07 | 01:22:56 | 06:01 +00:06 | 01:22:56 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Jessie struggled in several running segments, particularly Running 1, Running 3, Running 4, and Running 7. Her times in these segments were consistently slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in her running abilities. Additionally, her overall running time of 00:44:39 was 02:37 slower than the average, suggesting that she could benefit from additional running training.
In conclusion, Jessie Scraton had a strong performance in the 2023 London Hyrox race, but there is room for improvement, particularly in her running segments. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, focusing on pacing, transition time, strength training, and running training, she can enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Louise | 2024 Manchester | 01:22:41 | |
| Frey Annalena | 2024 Köln | 01:23:15 | |
| Triebess Sabrina | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:23:12 | |
| Ardenghi Mirea | 2024 Turin | 01:22:50 | |
| Depetra Isabella | 2024 Melbourne | 01:23:06 | |
| Marlow Billie | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:59 | |
| Douat Klara | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:22:46 | |
| Brunel Julie | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:23:23 | |
| Brabant Jamie | 2023 Dallas | 01:22:26 | |
| Lawrenson Kara | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
